INCREASING DIVERSION OF ORGANICS

December 1, 1999, Whittier, California

Part of a Forum Series to Assist Local Jurisdictions in Getting to 50% Diversion

Organized by the Southern California Council on Environment and Development

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Recycling Food through Non-Profit Organizations

Damien Leone, L.A. Regional Food Bank, 877-NO-HUNGER (667-8643), Ext. 130:

We are one of largest food banks in the country, diverting 40 million pounds annually of surplus food and personal care items. We distribute food to 960 charities, which feed 260,000 people per week. We encourage more donations.

Hotel and Restaurant Food Waste Recycling

Bill Gorman, West Coast Recycling Company, 323-261-4176:

Our company recycles food waste from large restaurants and hotels with large catering and food service operations. They experience a cost savings of 10-15% without any extra labor involved

Supermarket Organics Recycling

Eric Wilhite, Community Recycling, 818-767-1203:

We recycle edible unsalables from grocery stores (perishable goods) that used to go to landfills. The result is the cleanest, purest organic compost on the market. Farmers love it. Every ton is sold every 3 weeks before it is done.

L.A. County Grasscycling Program

Joe Haworth, Information Officer, L.A. County Sanitation Districts, 562-699-7411:

L.A. County’s Mow Down Pollution Program is a region-wide grasscycling campaign. We are trying to educate the public to use mowers without a bag, so the grass goes right back on the lawn, and fertilizes it.

Using Green Materials in Landfills

Nick Morell, L.A. County Sanitation Districts, 562-699-7411, Ext. 2444

Alternative Daily Cover (ADC) using greenwaste has helped us to achieve our AB 939 goals. Placing greenwaste on the refuse at the end of the day has many benefits including conservation of air volume, odor and vector control, as well as preserving soil for intermediate and final cover use.

A State Perspective on Organics Diversion

Howard Levenson, Waste Prevention & Market Development, CIWMB, 916-255-2159:

The Board has many efforts to support the diversion of organic materials and promote their beneficial use. These include fact sheets, end-user application guidelines, compost/mulch supplier and worm bin manufacturer lists, etc. Check our website at www.ciwmb.ca.gov/Organics.

Sustainable End Markets for Organics

Kevin McCarthy, California Organics Recycling Council (CORC) & Waste Management, Inc., 510-563-4214:

The CORC Board is recommending the “Yard Waste Recycling Opportunities Act,” which would require California jurisdictions to divert yard waste from landfilling through programs consistent with the AB 939 waste management hierarchy.

A Successful Municipal Greenwaste Program

David Peterson, City of Santa Clarita, 661-284-1411:

We have good separation of greenwaste (it totals 48% of our waste stream). We encourage home composting with a reduced fee. We mulch or compost tree trimmings and Christmas trees and we use it on parks and medians for weed abatement, etc.

Managing the Dynamics of the Organics Industry

Bill Camarillo, California Wood Recycling, 805-650-1616:

Greenwaste recycling has created a supply push on an undeveloped marketplace. We need to provide hundreds of products, customized for specific industries and customers. The CIWMB also needs to push regulatory reform to help get more compost facilities permitted.

Countywide Yard Waste Program

George DeLaO, L.A. County Dept of Public Works, 626-458-5184:

The Yard Waste Program includes workshops throughout the County to teach composting, grass recycling, and water-wise gardening techniques to help residents reduce yard waste in their own backyards. Workshops are held at the County’s demonstration centers and at cities’ facilities.

Environmental Hotline and Website

Sev Williams, Earth’s 911, 310-401-0317:

Earth’s 911 is an information resource on national and local environmental issues, via either phone (1-800-CLEANUP) or the Internet, (www.1800cleanup.org). Users can punch in their zip code to get local information including recycling locations, hazardous waste disposal, water and air quality and organics diversion.

SUMMARIES OF PRESENTATIONS

For more information, contact the speaker.

Welcome

Joe Haworth, L.A. County Sanitation Districts, 562-699-7411:

The Southern California Council on Environment and Development (SCCED) has worked since 1993 to bring issues of sustainability to the cities of the region. It has been very successful, involving organizations, corporations and public agencies. We are proud of what Kathleen Gildred has accomplished with SCCED.

Recycling Food through Non-Profit Organizations

Damien Leone, L.A. Regional Food Bank, 877-NO-HUNGER (667-8643), Ext. 130:

We are one of largest food banks in the country, diverting 40 million pounds annually of surplus and second quality food and personal care items. We distribute food to 960 charities, which feed 260,000 people per week. We want to encourage more donations.

Our sources include donations from:

• Retail and manufacturing distribution centers

• Processing and manufacturing plants

• Reclamation centers

• Dry and cold storage facilities

• Logistic trucking companies

• Food service distributors

• Restaurant, caterers and prepared foods

Objections we hear to making donations:

• The company president often says, “We never have any waste ever.” But we talk with others in the organization, and usually find more accurate information about surplus items.

• “What if some homeless lady gets sick and sues us?” That’s not a issue because there are several “Good Samaritan” laws that protect companies. We have been operating for 25 years without problems. We provide product and donation integrity. We put donation stickers on in accordance with the major trade associations guidelines. We are regularly inspected by government inspectors.

Types of donations include products with:

• Cosmetic and production errors not affecting edibility

• Change in recipe formula or packaging

• Out of season items (such as chocolate Easter bunnies at Christmas time)

• Meat products with labels only in foreign languages.

We feature convenient quick pick-up, on the same day, or the next weekday, in climate-controlled refrigerated trucks. We are a member of the Second Harvest network. We also take personal care, cleaning products, or anything you can use in your home.

Companies say they donate because it is the right thing to do, and they save the disposal cost.

Questions:

Q: Who do we call?

A: Here is a sample list of places to call to make donations of various goods:

– L.A. Regional Food Bank, 877-NO-HUNGER (667-8643), Ext. 130: All types of food, personal care products, paper goods, cleaning supplies for the home.

– L.A. Shares, 213-485-1097: office supplies, art supplies, miscellaneous goods.

– Habitat for Humanity, 213-975-9757: building supplies

– Goodwill Industries, 888-4GOODWILL: used clothes, furniture, appliances, computers, and other miscellaneous goods.

Q: What is your minimum amount?

A: We need at least a pallet load for us to send a truck.

Q: Do you have written information on the Good Samaritan laws?

A: I can send it to you.

Hotel and Restaurant Food Waste Recycling

Bill Gorman, West Coast Recycling Company, 323-261-4176:

Our company handles food waste from large restaurants and hotels with large catering and food service operations. There is about 40-50% waste in food products from plate scrapings and kitchen preparations.

We started with the Disneyland Hotels and found them motivated to do waste food separation and recycling. We now include all restaurants in the theme park. We collect 7-8 tons/day, 365 days/year. Unfortunately, we are not equipped to go to a larger scale because our capacity to handle waste is limited.

The operation at the hotel is simple. We just place a 44 gal Rubbermaid container next to the kitchen prep areas and one additional container for waste food at the bussing stations. We instruct the staff to separate waste food from the trash container. When our container is filled, it is dollied out to a loading dock. Once the operation is set up, it becomes a regular daily routine. We exchange the filled containers for empty steam-cleaned containers with tight snap lids (like Tupperware). We pick up a maximum of twice a day, using bobtail vehicles with lift gates.

The hotels experience a cost savings of 10-15% without any extra labor involved. The current landfill fee, plus shipping fee, is about $41/ton. We charge $35/ton.

They also get other benefits, such as getting the waste food out of their garbage compactors, eliminating odors, eliminating leaking liquids from compactors, adding to life of compactors by eliminating corrosive liquids. They also have a decrease in back injury claims because the employees don’t have to lift and dump the heavy barrels into the compactor.

The renderers used to pay for waste cooking oils, but now they charge the hotels to pick them up. So our accounts have found that instead of maintaining a odor-filled waste oil container, they dump the oil into our food waste container and we pick it up daily.

The food waste is used as an ingredient for livestock feed.

Q: Since this counts as a diversion from landfills, can we get a count of the tonnage?

A: Yes, we can provide monthly accounting by tonnage or by container.

Q: Do you experience contamination?

A: We train the kitchen staff for a day or two, and that has been not a problem. A little paper or plastic is not a issue, but there cannot be any broken glasses or bottles, since we are using it for animal feed.

Q: Can you expand?

A: We are working with Consolidated Services of Republic Industries to find another use for the bench waste. Some of it is too liquid for feed. Right now we are limited to 50 tons/day.

Supermarket Organics Recycling

Eric Wilhite, Community Recycling, 818-767-1203:

We recycle edible unsalables from grocery stores (perishable goods) that used to go to landfills. We divert over 100 trucks/week from landfills.

We have the grocery store personnel put them in the same wax-coated cardboard containers they were shipped in. (The coated boxes are not recyclable as cardboard.) The boxes are palletized, capped, wrapped, and sent back to the companies that distribute the perishables. They are dumped in our facilities at the loading dock and taken to our grinding facility. There they are mixed with municipal greenwaste (we have contracts with cities), and then shipped to our compost site in Lamont near Bakersfield.

Our composting site has 600 acres, with 100 acres composting at any one time. Each row handles 1100 tons, and is filled in one week. The site is built to higher than state standards for composting. It is clay-lined and surrounded by a 100-year flood berm. We use clay drains to drain excess water to a pond, where it is reused. We use “walking floors” to dump it in the windrows on the site. Within 6-24 hours of delivery it is already composting. We use recycled water from Lamont, and finish with fresh water. It takes about 3 months to compost.

The result is the cleanest, purest organic compost on the market. The farmers love it. Every ton is sold every 3 weeks before it is done. California Poly has tested it and found it is very productive. We grew some corn to advertise it. Compared to an average corn crop, the corn grown with our compost is twice as high.

This is closed loop recycling because the compost grows the food products that go to the grocery store. Vons bags it and sells to their customers at a very nominal charge. Through our partners, we donate it to cities for fertilizing ball parks, etc. We also have compost education programs.

Q: What about the wax-lined cardboard?

A: It becomes part of the compost, so everything is diverted from the landfill.

Q: How much do you charge to take the greenwaste?

A: The rates vary for different cities.

Q: How much tonnage have you diverted?

A: We don’t know exactly. We know we have diverted 60-70% of the waste from Vons stores. All Vons stores are participating. They would be able to quantify the diversion rate. We are also getting some from Ralph’s, Safemarket, Pavilions, Safeway, and Food 4 Less.

We also take greenwaste from street sweepings. [Carson generates 131 tons/month of street sweepings, which adds 2% to its diversion rate.]

LA County Grasscycling Program

Joe Haworth, Information Officer, L.A. County Sanitation Districts, 562-699-7411:

L.A. County’s Mow Down Pollution Program is a region-wide grasscycling campaign. We are trying to educate the public to use electric mowers without a bag. Most mowers (gas or electric) can be used without a bag, but the best is a mulching mower.

Grass clippings are difficult for us because they the most odorous product we have in the landfill. We try to blend them immediately with other greenwaste for our cover.

This is our third year of the campaign. In the first year, we did advertising and electric mower sales. We spent $200,000 and we sold 800 electric mulching mowers at discounted prices. With the help of CIWMB, we got some newspaper articles published to instruct people on how to grasscycle.

In the second year, we decided to do a grassroots program. We went to the haulers and the cities, and said we need you to use your technicians to inform the public, about mulching mowers. The haulers put out tens of thousands of pieces of literature. We had a PR firm that designed formats for door hangers, flyers, etc. They provided Zip disks with the materials and the haulers just had to put their logo on it. They also had posters for the sides of the trucks. They provided the materials in both English and Spanish.

We are now getting up to 3% diversion of grass clippings.

From January 2000 through August 2000, we have used radio PSAs. We are developing a TV PSA using the Harlem Globetrotters, showing how easy it is to mow without a bag. Ploughshares is helping with the PSA distribution.

We want to thank Earth 911, which is providing an environmental hotline and website: www.1800cleanup.org. You can put in your Zip code and find out what is going on in your area.

We have an attractive demonstration booth for fairs that shows how grasscycling is done. We have done local workshops in various cities, as well as some county programs. We placed a few newspaper ads in Long Beach and the San Gabriel Valley, but we are mainly hoping for news pickups, especially by the gardening editors.

There are still subsidized electric mulching lawnmower sales. AQMD and ARB will provide $40,000 in subsidies, so a cordless rechargeable costs $150, and a corded for $75.

CIWMB does a survey before and after the programs to see impact. We want to have 5-7% of the populace involved, and then it will take off because everyone will see someone in their neighborhood doing it. When the environmental movement got up to 5% participation, it started spreading like wildfire.

Q: Where does the grass go?

A: It goes right back on the lawn, so it fertilizes it. It also reduces the amount of water and fertilizer you need. You need to follow the rules and only cut the top 1/3 of the grass length.

Using Green Materials in Landfills

Nick Morell, L.A. County Sanitation Districts, 562-699-7411, Ext. 2444

We have four active landfills, representing approximately 20,000 tons per day of disposal. (It should be noted that Spadra Landfill was closed in April, 2000.) These facilities handle waste and diversion materials from over 65 cities and 6 garbage disposal districts.

We have an active materials recovery program, including asphalt, refuse-to-energy ash, white goods, soil, ferrous metals, motor oil, tires, etc. We also recover methane gas and produce energy.

Alternative Daily Cover (ADC) using greenwaste has helped cities to achieve their AB 939 goals. The greenwaste is placed on the refuse at the end of the day to meet the mandatory daily cover requirements. The many benefits of the program are:

AB 939 credits
Conservation of air volume and reduced soil use
Reduced tipping fees for greenwaste
Enhanced potential for landfill gas generation
Odor control
Vector control
Control measure for rain infiltration and erosion
Useful material for onsite landscaping efforts
After it is ground up, the material is generally homogeneous and brown, not “green”. We pick-up the processed material with a “scraper”, transport it to the active disposal area and place it on the face of the daily “cell” of the landfill. This material is as easy to apply as soil. It falls out of the scraper bowl easily, except that it is somewhat “lumpy” and must be applied by a skilled operator. Although it is an ideal substitute for soil, we have experienced some odor problems during the winter months, due to the quality of the unprocessed material (age and moisture content), as well as variable wind and weather conditions.

We cover the active landfill face which varies in size by landfill site (20,000 to 160,000 square feet per day), with a layer 6-12 inches thick when compacted. Since we started this program in 1989, we have handled 2 million tons of greenwaste.

Q: What do you charge?

A: The tipping fee for greenwaste is $11.50 per ton vs. $18 for refuse at Puente Hills and Spadra landfills. About 3% of the loads are rejected, because they contain litter, large stumps, or are noticeably odorous. We charge a hard-to-handle fee of $22 per ton for rejected greenwaste.

This low fee can only be passed on to customers as a result of its use in the construction of the landfills. The tipping cost for all waste materials, including greenwaste, will go up as the handling and transportation costs increase, which will make other alternatives more economically feasible as locally available sites like the Spadra Landfill close.

We would prefer if people would leave grass clippings on their lawn, but we have created a beneficial use for greenwaste in the County. Otherwise we would be using dirt or plastic film to do the covering.

Q: How does your pricing of greenwaste disposal compare to that of private greenwaste processors?

A: We have increased our tipping fee slightly which may encourage people to haul materials to a composting site if it can be used. That is the solution in the long term. The tree trimmers go to USA Biomass, because they know they won’t be rejected for oversized material.

Q: Has L.A. County Sanitation considered a private composting facility on any of your landfills?

A: The issue is that our disposal area constantly is moved around the surface of landfill to ensure that drainage is always maintained and the slopes grow evenly. Based upon this need to be mobile, we even have even experienced difficulties storing waste tires in one location, prior to periodic recovery or shredding. We want to do our job, cover the refuse and efficiently meet all of the health and safety regulations.

Q: Using greenwaste as ADC is a disincentive to organics recycling.

A: We agree it is best to leave it on the lawn, but if people want it collected, we can reuse it. It would cost more to ship this material to a composting facility. It also would be very difficult if not impossible for us to process, bag and sell 1300 tons of compost in this area every day. Therefore ADC is an ideal use for the large quantity of material generated in this urban region on a daily basis.

A State Perspective on Organics Diversion

Howard Levenson, Waste Prevention & Market Development, CIWMB, 916-255-2159:

In 1990, the CIWMB estimated that about 15 million tons of organic materials were generated statewide, including 30% of commercial waste and 43% of residential waste generation. About 90% of these materials were sent to landfills. Today, based on the CIWMB’s 1999 Waste Characterization Study, organic materials still comprise about 35 to 40% of what is disposed in landfills.

In terms of using organics, a California Organics Recycling Council (CORC) survey in the mid-1990s found that perhaps 3-4 million tons were being composted or mulched. Statewide, the Department of Transportation (Caltrans) reported using 960,000 cubic yards of mulch for maintenance in 1996, but this figure dropped to 150,000 cubic yards in 1999. In a 1999 survey of 75 local jurisdictions, we found very few formal city or county programs designed to buy back the materials generated in their jurisdiction. We know that agriculture and landscaping usage is high, but the actual amounts are unknown. Organic materials also are used as alternative daily cover (ADC) at landfills. In 1998, 844,000 tons were used for ADC in Southern California, including 425,000 tons in Los Angeles County and 200,000 tons in Orange County.

In 1999, CIWMB staff attempted to survey composting facilities about their use of organic materials, but the survey failed due to insufficient responses from operators. As a result, in 2000 the CIWMB contracted for a new survey through an independent consultant, with the identity of the facilities masked. The goal is to get responses from 80% of composters and mulchers. The final report on this survey is due in late 2000. The CIWMB does maintain a voluntary list on its web site of composting companies who want to market their services.

Ideally, we want a home for all compostable organic materials, in a manner that protects the environment and public health and safety. We need to ensure we have safe processing facilities, but they often are hard to site. To ensure public safety and environmental health, the CIWMB regulates the operation of composting facilities. Changes in the regulations are being considered to eliminate loopholes and provide more opportunities for business development.

One of the biggest operational issues for composting facilities is odor. Previously, the authority to respond to odor complaints was vested with Air Quality Management Districts. Now, however, local enforcement on odor issues is typically the responsibility of County Environmental Health Departments, working in conjunction with the CIWMB. To assist local enforcement efforts, the CIWMB is developing a resource guide that will include information on how to set up a facility and how to solve odor problems.

We also want to ensure product quality and consistency. Buyers of compost need better information on the products. The problem is that there are no industry standards for compost quality. A voluntary organization, the California Compost Quality Council (CCQC) has developed a voluntary registration system in which registered producers agree to disclose product parameters. Currently 15 composters in California are registered with CCQC. The CIWMB has contracted with CCQC for an updating of its testing and inspection manuals, and is attempting to coordinate with the US Composting Council on development of a national quality seal program.

Relatively few official specifications exist for compost and mulch. The CIWMB has fact sheets available on its web site on how to write specifications and on assessing the quality of compost for agriculture and home gardening. Under contract to the CIWMB, Cal Poly Pomona reviewed specifications and end-use guidelines. CIWMB staff is preparing fact sheets based on this report, with publication anticipated in late 2000.

Caltrans has specifications for composted mulch that are oriented towards weed seed suppression and erosion control. Caltrans specs include sufficient heating to kill weed seeds, plus curing to ensure no biological activity is going on. The CIWMB and Caltrans sent a joint letter to composters in early 2000 explaining these specifications and providing additional information on working with Caltrans.

The advantages of using compost include disease suppression, improved health of soils, and water retention. The CIWMB has sponsored numerous compost demonstration projects, with reports available on its website. For example, a 1997 UC Riverside avocado project showed that mulch suppressed root rot. A 1997 Caltrans report examined the effectiveness of using mulch for erosion control. The CIWMB also reports for projects involving citrus orchard erosion control, and has new projects on hillside vineyard erosion control.

The CIWMB has an outreach program in several regions around the state to educate landscape contractors about mulching, grasscycling, and other sustainable landscaping practices. As part of this, UC Riverside will be publishing landscaping-related publications in 2000. We plan to include building/property managers and architects/designers in future outreach efforts. We also have worked with the California Landscape Contractors Association to revise its Resource Recovery CLCA handbook.

For the latest information on CIWMB activities related to organic materials management, please check our website at www.ciwmb.ca.gov/Organics.

Sustainable End Markets for Organics

Kevin McCarthy, California Organics Recycling Council (CORC) & Waste Management, Inc., 510-563-4214:

CORC is a technical council within the California Resource Recovery Association (CRRA). The CRRA is a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization founded in 1974, involving representatives of recycling companies, consultants, haulers, public agencies, and others dedicated to promoting waste reduction, reuse, recycling, pollution prevention, composing and expanding the market for recycled content products. For more information, see our website at www.crrra.com

CORC monitors state and federal regulations regarding organics and provides public information. We were founded in 1992 and operate on an all volunteer basis. We comment on proposed laws and regulations regarding organics. However, we are not trying to be the Compost Council; our constituency is basically the municipalities who want to increase diversion of organics.

The CORC Board Members include:

Cliff Feldman, City of Oakland (510) 238-6815

Stephen Grealy, City of San Diego (858) 573-1275

Michael Gross, Zanker Road Landfill (San Jose) (408) 934-2416

Jack Macy, City and County of San Francisco (415) 554-3423

Brian Mathews, Alameda County Waste Management Authority (510) 614-1699

Kevin McCarthy, Waste Management Inc. (510) 563-4214 [email protected]

If you are setting up a greenwaste program, call someone on this list, we have a lot of experience that can help you.

CORC’s goals are:

Maximize diversion of organics from the waste stream by:
Restoring a “program” focus to AB 939, moving away from an accounting-based focus
Supporting diversion programs that promote the following waste management practices in order of priority (same as AB 939 priorities):
Source reduction
Recycling and composting
Environmentally safe transformation
Land disposal (last on the list)
Support development of environmentally superior and diverse end markets involving the highest and best use of organic materials. (ADC would be a last resort.)
Serve as a technical clearinghouse and resource on organic materials recycling programs.
Provide expert testimony and comments on legislation and regulations.
On October 28, 1999, the CORC Board unanimously approved a resolution entitled the “Yard Waste Recycling Opportunities Act.” This act would require every California jurisdiction to divert yard waste from landfilling through implementing residential and commercial diversion programs. These diversion programs would promote the AB 939 waste management hierarchy. Approved end markets would include compost, mulch, biomass fuel, and/or feedstock for new or reconstituted products.

This resolution is CORC’s new organics policy position. We are seeking feedback on the resolution as part of a potential legislative effort.

We don’t consider ADC as an end market for yard waste. We support sustainable end markets that reflect environmentally superior and diverse end uses. Yard waste that is processed into mulch and compost products has the following benefits:

conserves landfill space
conserves water
improves soil quality
creates jobs
promotes the economy through retail product sales.
Yard waste processed into a feedstock as a biomass fuel:

conserves landfill space
reduces fossil fuel use
creates jobs
generates power.
Yard waste used as ADC reduces excavation of native soils. And the methane gas collection must be 100% or it contributes to global warming. ADC is taking in valuable material at a very low disposal price and diverting it from its best use.

Since 1996, when the state approved ADC use to meet diversion goals, its usage has nearly doubled, from 560 thousand tons to over 1 million tons in 1998, with 80% of that increase in Southern California. This dramatic increase raises some fundamental questions: Are statewide market development efforts for organics being undermined and are the year 2000 diversion goals and CIWMB enforcement efforts creating an incentive for increased ADC usage?

How did ADC compare to other diverted materials statewide in 1996, according to the Department of Conservation?

Newspaper: 647,096 tons

Green materials ADC: 560,266 tons

Mixed paper: 349,738 tons

Glass: 220,355 tons

Plastic: 45,138 tons

Aluminum cans: 7,838 tons

It is highly likely that ADC with green materials is now the single largest “diverted” curbside material in California. But does this really match AB 939’s intent to divert materials from landfills so as to conserve landfill capacity? Does ADC use match the impression of “recycling” held by California’s 24 million recyclers?

I would like to present two case studies on costs of ADC vs. composting.

A small city in the Bay area has its collection vehicles unload at a landfill with a permitted composting facility. A hypothetical tip fee of $12.50/ton for ADC could be compared to a tip fee for composting of $24/ton. Composting would mean an increase of only 69¢ per month or $8.28 per household per year.

A large city in the Bay area currently pays $26.50/ton for all end uses at a transfer station. The proposed tip fee for composting of $32.50/ton would cost only 10¢ per month or $1.20 per household per year.

In Southern California, the longer you wait, the faster your landfill capacity will be used up and the higher costs you will have sooner rather than later. You have done a good job in getting the market set up for greenwaste. Wean yourself off ADC and change to compost or other environmentally beneficial end markets.

Please get involved in CORC, give us a call.

A Successful Municipal Greenwaste Program

David Peterson, City of Santa Clarita, 661-284-1411:

Santa Clarita has 150,000 people living in 47 sq. miles. Our greenwaste program totals 48% of our waste stream by weight, mostly coming from residences. We have a lot of large lots that fill up 1.5-yard bins every few weeks. The total is 18,000 tons per year.

In 1996 we offered a 65 gallon bin for greenwaste. Our waste study shows that is ok for the standard family. We have an additional charge for an additional bin, or they can put out a 32 gal bin with a tag for the hauler.

We encourage home composting, by providing gardeners with a $1.50 fee reduction and no bin, but only 1000 households are doing that.

We have recycled Christmas trees since 1991. We used to advertise on TV, now we only do newspaper ads. We accept them if there are no ornaments. Last year we mulched 10,000 Christmas trees. We use it for our parks. We also give bags out free on Arbor Day. People show up even in the rain, last year we gave out 2000 bags.

The city arborist sends the tree trimmings for mulch or composting and we use it for parks and medians for weed abatement, etc.

In our public education project on pollution prevention, we put all programs in one umbrella. We have only one composting brochure. We need ideas for better literature.

Managing the Dynamics of the Organics Industry

Bill Camarillo, California Wood Recycling, 805-650-1616:

We process over 250,000 tons/year of greenwaste. We are a professional wood and greenwaste management and marketing firm providing comprehensive turn-key services for waste haulers and city and county governments. We process, manage, recycle and market greenwaste materials and hundreds of products. For more information see our website, www.agromin.com

The organics industry includes the compost industry, the dairy industry, the forest industry, the solid waste industry, the bio-solids industry, the landscapers and the agriculture industry.

Greenwaste recycling has created a supply push on an undeveloped marketplace. The CIWMB needs to push regulatory reform to help us get more compost facilities permitted. This is the only industry that can meet the demand of handling all this supply.

CIWMB needs to help because we can’t compete with low tip fees for greenwaste. The compost industry is hard to site because of odors, so it should be located at landfills. We operate a composting facility on a landfill that we move on 30 days notice.

The solution to greenwaste is demand-side economics. We need a market development plan and more demonstration projects. We need to create value-added products with a sustainable marketplace for finished goods and services. The end users must have confidence in the products they purchase. The California Compost Quality Council (CCQC) has been helpful in developing standards.

We need to provide hundreds of products, customized for specific industries and customers, including nurseries, agriculture, golf course, sod and turf, etc. This industry makes beauty, energy, and food. ADC should only be a last resort after making every effort for better uses.

Countywide Yard Waste Program

George De La O, Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, 626-458-5184:

Because approximately 20% of the residential waste stream consists of yard waste, the Countywide Yard Waste Program was established in 1991 to reduce and divert this yard waste from landfills.

The Program uses Smart Gardening workshops, held countywide, to teach residents:

composting, including worm composting, to recycle organic material into a nutrient-rich soil amendment
grass recycling to allow the grass clippings to decompose and release nutrients back into the lawn
water-wise gardening techniques to conserve water and reduce yard waste while maintaining a beautiful and efficient landscape
Residents are taught about the need for diversion, the State’s waste reduction mandate and the limited landfill capacity, before teaching composting, grass recycling, and water-wise gardening.

It is stressed to the participants that composting is easy, saves time, money, and results in better lawns and gardens. Residents can compost with a variety of bins, including a home-made one. All of the County’s demonstration centers have various types of bins for demonstrating composting techniques. The Smart Gardening workshops also provide information on how worm composting can be used to compost kitchen scraps.

Some of the centers also have a grass recycling demonstration area to assist in showing residents the proper methods for grass recycling successfully. Several of the demonstration centers are also located within facilities which contain various samples of water-wise plants and a few like the Arboretum of Los Angeles County and the Castaic Lake Water Agency also have displays on water efficient irrigation.

Some of the centers have also recently received new raised planter beds which display plants with varying water requirements. These plants are watered using drip irrigation to help conserve water. In addition, some centers have also received a new trellis to provide shade for the residents attending the workshop.

The Program also provides compost bins at a discount, displays at regional events, and does outreach through the use of billboards, newspaper advertisements, and radio and television public service announcements. In 1998, the Program reached approximately 900 residents through the workshops and an additional 19,000 through participation at regional events. Thousands more were reached through the Program’s website at www.smartgardening.com.

For more information on the Countywide Yard Waste Program or to schedule a workshop for your organization, call 1-888-CLEANLA.

Environmental Hotline and Website

Sev Williams, Earth’s 911, 310-401-0317:

Earth’s 911 is an information resource on national and local environmental issues, via either phone (1-800-CLEANUP) or the Internet, (www.1800cleanup.org). Users can punch in their zip code to get local information including recycling locations, hazardous waste disposal, water and air quality and organics diversion.

Earth’s 911 is a free service funded by the private sector.

Earth’s 911 is the official hotline for CIWMB, and California EPA. EPA Region 9 and Cal EPA have signed a Harmonization Agreement to consolidate the state’s environmental outreach efforts under 1-800-CLEANUP and www.1800CLEANUP.org. The idea is to drive everyone to the same place for information.

Earth’s 911 consolidates high quality TV, radio and print Public Service Announcements (PSAs) and has loaded them onto www.1800CLEANUP.org to be viewed by local government agencies and non profit organizations. Many feature in celebrities such as Ted Danson, Mario Andretti, Steven Seagal, etc. This service is also available for local communities to use pre-produced materials instead of spending additional resources to create new ones.

Earth’s 911 recruited the Harlem Globetrotters to make a TV PSA to show how simple grasscycling is. Other communities can use these materials, with a local call to action. Earth’s 911 works closely with agencies and non profits to get their content in the voice-over and tag plate of the PSAs.

We can also tell people where to bring Christmas trees for recycling. Our user interface will allow the agency to get a code and update the data for your site. We maintain quality control.

We are developing a relationship with the US Compost Council. Home Depot will fund them to call up local representatives in California to gather data for posting it on the system. Home Depot funds Christmas tree recycling. They provide a tag for the Christmas tree with a phone number to call for recycling information. We are doing a statewide campaign involving all Home Depot stores throughout the state.

We would like to expand to work with every community in California. We have resources available and can customize PSAs for your city and provide links to your website. We do uation tracking of every visit to our site.

If you let us know when your PSAs go on the air, we can tell you how many calls came in from your region and how much oil was recycled, etc.

Check out the way the site and phone system are structured and feel free to provide feedback to us. We got 800,000 hits last month, and it is increasing because of agencies putting out PSAs. It was set up to save money for taxpayers as a resource to support your efforts.

CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION RECYCLING

September 28, 1999, Whittier, California

Part of a Forum Series to Assist Local Jurisdictions in Getting to 50%

Organized by the Southern California Council on Environment and Development

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Recycling and Reusing C&D Materials

Kelly Ingalls, Regional Director, Construction Materials Recycling Association of Southern California (CMRA), Moderator: The City of Los Angeles can provide a free C&D recycling tool kit, contact the Bureau of Sanitation (213) 847-1444. Since 1995 the City of Los Angeles has required use of CMB and recycled concrete, rather than virgin materials, in road and street work.

Recycling Concrete

Dan Copp, President of Dan Copp Crushing, Anaheim: We sell 2 million tons per year of road base made from recycled concrete, with no failures. It is equivalent to virgin aggregate and saves the state, cities and counties considerable money.

Engineering Considerations in Using Recycled Aggregate

Steve Marvin, President and Professional Engineer, LaBelle and Marvin, Santa Ana:

Recycling makes environmental and economic sense, whether you reuse the materials on site, or do recycling off site.

Recycling C&D in Los Angeles

Jerry Ellison, Bureau of Engineering, City of Los Angeles: The City Bureau of Street Services uses 90% recycled pavement in resurfacing city streets, more than any other agency in this country.

C&D Disposal, Recycling and Reclamation at Landfills and MRFs

Joe Haworth, L.A. County Sanitation Districts, Moderator.

Recycling and Reclamation at Nu-Way Landfill

John Workman, Waste Management (District Manager for Nu-Way Landfill, Irwindale): We accept both recyclable and non-recyclable inert construction materials. Non-recyclable loads are used for land reclamation. Recyclable concrete is crushed and sold as Class 2 Base material.

The Economics of C&D Recycling

Joe Sloan, Director of Market Development, Consolidated Disposal Services: The impediments to recycling are high land costs for recycling facilities and low tipping fees. In states where tipping fees are over $50 per ton, there is no C&D waste going to landfills.

Running a C&D Recycling Facility

John Richardson, Vice President and General Manager, Community Recycling: We put in equipment to recover dirt, wood, concrete and metal out of the C&D loads. We recycle just about everything except pieces of brick.

Report from the CIWMB on C&D Recycling Statewide

Senator David Roberti, Member of the CIWMB: The Board is working with developers, educating building professionals, posting local construction ordinances on our website, making loans in recycling market development zone program (RMDZ) and developing a reference manual. Several important bills also passed this session.

Tour of Sanitation District’s Pilot Project on C&D Recycling

Joe Houghton, L.A. County Sanitation Districts: We are doing a pilot project to use C&D waste as part of our ADC. We have found that mixing the ground up C&D with ground up greenwaste decreases the offensive odor and emphasizes a pine tree type of smell.

Welcome

Kathleen Gildred, Executive Director, SCCED:

We welcome you here today. SCCED has been working since 1993 to educate people towards sustainability. In June 1998, we had a very successful conference called “Getting to 50%” to inform people about ways to meet the 50% diversion goal. Since then we have had a series of forums on key topics, including Commercial Diversion and Multi-family Recycling, plus providing Southern California input into the CIWMB future planning process. Summaries from these meetings have been posted on our website at www.scced.org. We will have an upcoming forum on December 1 on Recycling Organics, as well as a “Take It Back” waste strategies conference, February 28 – March 1, 2000.

Recycling and Reusing C&D Materials

Kelly Ingalls, Regional Director, Construction Materials Recycling Association of Southern California (CMRA), Moderator:

We have just established the first local chapter in the USA of CMRA, which is a group of stakeholders interested in promoting C&D as a new industry standard. We hold quarterly meetings on the first Wednesday of the month. The next meeting will be Oct. 6 on wood recycling with a presentation on Canfibre by David Saltman and others. Please sign up for our mailing list by calling 818-548-8996 or sending an email to kmibldg@earthlink,net.

The City of Los Angeles has a C&D recycling tool kit available for free, contact the Bureau of Sanitation (213) 847-1444.. It lists where can you buy recycled materials. Since 1995 the City of Los Angeles has required use of recycled crushed miscellaneous base (CMB) and recycled concrete rather than virgin materials in road and street work. We see CMB as equivalent to Caltrans Class 2. However, many other localities do not allow the use of CMB.

Recycling Concrete

Dan Copp, President of Dan Copp Crushing, Anaheim:

We have been crushing used C&D materials since 1978 for recycled road base. We have 14 sites, plus we do on-site crushing using 4 portable crushing plants. Each plant is fully permitted with the local Air Quality Management Districts.

We collect asphalt and concrete from highways or building demolition. Often we crush the material on site and leave it for the contractor to use in the new construction. Other contractors bring us their waste and we make it into a finished product for them or other projects.

Caltrans has the following specifications for public works construction:

• Class II Aggregate Base (CAB) (made of virgin rock or recycled materials)

• Crushed Miscellaneous Base (CMB) (made of recycled materials)

• Processed Miscellaneous Base (PMB) (made of recycled materials)

There are two spec books that are used in the industry, Caltrans Standard Specifications and the Greenbook Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction. Caltrans lists their material as Class II Aggregate per section 26. This product can be made from virgin aggregate or broken asphalt and concrete, or a combination of both. The Greenbook lists the material as Processed Miscellaneous Base (PMB) or Crushed Miscellaneous Base (CMB). Both PMB and CMB can be made from broken asphalt and concrete recycled materials.

Contractors wanted a material equivalent to crushed aggregate base CAB. Unfortunately PMB specs require an increased thickness of base material in roadway, the amount depending on the traffic index, soil base, etc. But L.A. County developed a crushed miscellaneous base (CMB) equivalent to CAB, which does not require an increased thickness.

Now we make both CMB and Class II Aggregate out of the same input materials. The Century Freeway base was built primarily of recycled materials, i.e. Class II Aggregate Base. We have crushed approximately 400,000 tons of asphalt and concrete on the Route 5 Freeway improvement. This project starts at the 22 Freeway interchange and continues northbound to the 91 Freeway interchange. There is approximately 125,000 tons remaining to crush before the project is completed.

Caltrans specs allow contractors to crush materials in the right of way. This is very cost effective because it reduces transportation costs. It costs about $10 per ton to ship, but only $3 per ton to crush it at the site, plus about $2 per ton for transportation within the job site. This also reduces the overall job cost to state and local agencies participating in the road improvement. It saves wear and congestion on the freeways hauling the material on site to a crusher stockpile as opposed to hauling off site to a recycler or inert landfill. Recycling on site also reduces congestion from hauling in from a virgin aggregate source.

Dumping C&D in the Irwindale, Sun Valley and Orange County landfills costs about $10 to 12 per ton. The savings from recycled material over virgin and the savings in tipping fees increase the further you are away from Irwindale. The price per ton includes trucking cost.

For example, at a job site in Santa Fe Springs, it costs $9.61 per ton to dump in the Irwindale Landfill, but only $4.48 per ton at my Recycling Yard in Santa Fe Springs, for a savings of $5.13 per ton. You can purchase virgin base at the Irwindale quarry for $10.96 per ton, while I charge only $6.04 per ton for equivalent recycled base, a savings of $4.92 per ton. All prices include trucking cost.

For a job site in Torrance, the hauling plus landfill tipping fee totals $14.12 per ton, while it costs only $6.54 per ton hauling and tipping fee at my recycling yard in Long Beach, a savings of $7.58 per ton. To purchase virgin base at an Irwindale quarry costs $13.54 per ton, including hauling, but only $6.97 per ton at my Long Beach Recycling Yard, a savings of $6.57 per ton.

Every incoming load is inspected, processed, and source separated. If it has dirt, grass or trash, we will not accept it, and you will have to take it to land fills. Some rebar is ok, but not steel spaghetti or bridge girders. We will also not take reinforced concrete pipe. Our quality control is high and it begins at the inspection prior to accepting the material.

Normally the color of our material is dark due to the content of crushed asphalt, but color does not indicate it is dirty.

The majority of agencies check the quality of the material as delivered at the job site. This method assures they are receiving quality material on the job.

We sell 2 million tons per year, with no failures in the materials we ship. The savings are considerable to the state, cities and counties.

Engineering Considerations in Using Recycled Aggregate

Steve Marvin, President and Professional Engineer, LaBelle and Marvin, Santa Ana:

In constructing highways, we have the choice to use new material from quarries, or to reuse old materials.

In uating materials, we know the quarries have a consistent product. We call this new aggregate base CAB (Crushed Aggregate Base). For material reuse, each load has to be inspected to maintain quality equivalent to new material. Sources of old material include:

• Old Aggregate Base

• Old Portland Cement Concrete from airfield and highway pavements, bridges and buildings

• Old Asphalt Concrete from airfield and highway pavements

From these sources, we can make:

• Crushed Miscellaneous Base (CMB)

• Processed Miscellaneous Base (PMB)

• “Class 2” Aggregate Base

In making asphalt concrete, currently suppliers can use up to 15% maximum reused material without specific testing, or greater than 15% with testing.

Caltrans standard specifications for public works construction include:

SE = sand equivalent (how much dirt is in it)

CV = cleanness value

LA Rattler = an abrasion test

SG = specific gravity

Dur = durability index

R = R Value, a measure of the strength of the material

Material

SE

CV

LA Rattler

SG

Dur

R

PCC (Portland Cement Concrete)

75/70%

75%

45/52 (Max)

2.58

60

N/A

AC (Asphalt Concrete)

45/50%

50/52

CAB (Crushed Aggregate Base)

50%

52 (Max)

2.58

40

80

CMB (Crushed Miscellaneous Base)

35%

52 (Max)

40

80

PMB (Processed Miscellaneous Base)

30

52 (Max)

78

Class 2 Aggregate Base

25

35

78

The Caltrans prevailing highway design procedure calls for the thickness (T) of the support layer to be based on the R Value strength of the support layer (R) and the index of traffic use (TI) using the following formula:

T = (0.0032) (100 – R) (TI)

Potential pitfalls in reused material come from contaminants, such as:

• Subgrade soils (from previous failure and distortion or excavation procedures)

• Reinforcing steel (rebar)

• Mis-handling at the recycling plant

In summary, recycling makes environmental and economic sense, whether you crush and reuse the materials on site, or do recycling off site. When quality control is used for both new and reused materials, it works well.

Recycling C&D in Los Angeles

Jerry Ellison, Bureau of Engineering, City of Los Angeles:

I am a civil engineer, having worked for the City of Los Angeles for 32 years, in streets, sewers and storm drains and now in structures.

The City of Los Angeles has a policy to reduce the waste stream by reusing. recycling and buying recycled products.

The Bureau of Engineering provides design management for sewers, storm drains, streets and architectural structures. Since sewer pipes last about 100 years, we have been relining them with plastic pipe to get another 50 years. We use trenchless technology by putting in a plastic line, blowing it up to fit the pipe, and letting harden in place. We can use microtunneling for small sewers.

We are working on bridges reuse. We have 6 ornate bridges that have been declared historic and needed seismic retrofits. We peeled off the decorations and then put them back on after the retrofit.

We have using CMB on our streets since 1977, as we realized we could be running out of virgin aggregate. We are happy to use CMB or PMB.

We add recycled asphalt to virgin asphalt. Our Board requires that we recycle all asphalt from city streets, but it is impossible for us to do now. We allow up to 15% recycled asphalt. Caltrans does not allow recycled asphalt. Because the asphalts we have here don’t wear out as fast (we don’t salt our roads in winter), our asphalts are in place longer, become more brittle and don’t recycle as well. However, Caltrans is working on a new spec.

The City Bureau of Street Services uses 90% recycled pavement in resurfacing city streets, more than any other agency in this country. It has own plants in Long Beach

In building construction, we don’t really do much recycling or use of CMB, but we have transformed many structures into other uses, such as old fire stations into community centers, etc.

Questions

Q: My city engineer doesn’t want to use non-virgin materials. Do engineers put in higher R values for virgin materials?

Marvin: Most engineers use an R value of 78, 80 is as high you can go. We add a little thickness sometimes when using recycled materials.

Q: How does recycled content work with rubberized asphalt?

Ellison: Rubberized asphalt does not allow recycled content according to the “Green Book.”

Q: Can you accept Petro-Mat and Fibre-Mat?

Copp: Petro-Mat is accepted if it is in chunks of asphalt, because we can pick the slabs up off the conveyer belt and/or segregation screen manually. We will not accept asphalt grindings that contain shredded Petro-mat because it could affect the quality of our product. It is very unlikely we would ever receive Fibre-Mat because it is so closely associated with the earth, so we would not accept it.

Q: If there are not enough bridge footings to justify an on site crusher, could you stockpile them at your yard until you get enough to do them?

Copp: We have limited space at our yard. We can’t collect and store them. But we can bring in a breaker if we have 8 hours of work,

Ingalls: L.A. City put in some money to help reach 50%. Recycling of concrete has been done since 1978, it is in the Caltrans spec book. The issue is getting other localities to do it.

C&D Disposal, Recycling and Reclamation at Landfills and MRFs

Joe Haworth, L.A. County Sanitation Districts, Moderator.

Recycling and Reclamation at Nu-Way Landfill

John Workman, Waste Management (District Manager for Nu-Way Landfill, Irwindale)

In the City of Irwindale, 26% of the land is either an active or closed sand and gravel quarry. The City has a master plan to reclaim the mines for redevelopment.

The Nu-Way Landfill is a mine reclamation project. Mnoian Management, with cooperation from the City of Irwindale, planned and permitted this landfill. Our conditional use permit is stricter than our State permits. Only inert construction materials such as concrete, asphalt, brick, and dirt may be accepted. Any materials that contain significant organic material or are water soluble are not acceptable.

We accept both recyclable and non-recyclable loads. The non-recyclable loads are placed in lifts, and compacted to 90 percent density specification. Material is placed as an engineered structural fill.

Recyclable loads are processed by Dan Copp to produce a Class 2 base material. Steel reinforcements are removed from the concrete with a jaw crusher and sold to scrap dealers. The amount of material recycled is a function of the market demand.

Mine reclamation is a very productive use for inert construction materials. The controlled method of placement of materials provides a strong and stable foundation for future site development. A similar reclamation site operated by Mnoian Management is the home of the Irwindale Speedway. The Nu-Way site is planned for commercial development as a post closure use.

The Economics of C&D Recycling

Joe Sloan, Director of Market Development, Consolidated Disposal Services:

I have done economic analysis relative to AB 939 and looked at the analytical process for a hauler to go through to assess the economic viability of a C&D recycling operation.

If a transfer station or MRF is not at capacity, we could do some deck sorting of roll-off loads and C&D dumps on the tipping floor, and recover wood, ferrous materials, rock, brick, concrete and gypsum.

With the building boom in Southern California, there is more C&D activity now. Whenever you are looking at the economics of recovery, you have to look at the different waste streams. In a single stream from residential areas or commercial programs, we focus on recovering paper. We get a productivity of about 600-2000 recovered pounds per man-hour. For mixed municipal solid waste in a dirty MRF, we only recover 250-750 pounds per man-hour. We see more material, but less is recyclable.

However, with C&D we can get high labor productivity. It doesn’t take long to pull out a safe or a file cabinet. At transfer stations, 10-15% recovery can occur on the deck, pulling out wood pallets, refrigerators, car parts, etc.

The difficulty is efficient use of the investment in a facility. Most transfer stations just want to get waste straight to a landfill, because it is more efficient. So we only do C&D recycling when we have excess capacity.

The economics are simple from a hauler’s perspective: What is the tipping fee and what is the hauling cost? If the material can go to a C&D recycling site, we look at the tipping and hauling cost at the recycling site vs. the landfill. For example, do you take it to a local C&D recycling facility for $35 per ton or to Puente Hills landfill for $18 per ton tipping fee (a difference of $17 per ton. You calculate the difference in truck time, remembering it cost $60 per hour to run the truck. For example, if it takes an extra hour and a half transportation time to get to Puente Hills, that costs $90. For a 5 ton load the difference in tipping fees is $17 x 5 or $84. So the savings in recycling would be $4, and would help the municipality get toward 50% diversion.

The problem is C&D recycling sites require capital, and the nature of the construction business is boom and bust, you can’t count on a steady stream of material. Most MRFs and transfer stations cost $10-20 million to construct. There are lower margins in C&D recycling than in waste transfer and landfilling, so companies driven by Wall Street are less prone to invest in C&D recycling.

The market will drive the C&D recycling. When landfill costs increase, you will see more recycling. Now, the impediments to recycling are high land costs for recycling facilities and low tipping fees. But that will change when you see tipping fees get up to $30-35 per ton. In states where tipping fees are over $50 per ton, there is no C&D waste going to landfills.

Running a C&D Recycling Facility

John Richardson, Vice President and General Manager, Community Recycling:

Community Recycling has over 200 employees in facilities in Southern California in Sun Valley and transfer stations. We do some C&D recycling, wood receiving, produce receiving, etc. at our transfer stations. Our dirty MRFs recycle cardboard, newspaper, aluminum cans, metal, etc.

We found pulling out wood and metal off the floor was not the way to go. So in 1992 we put in equipment to recover dirt, wood, concrete and metal out of the C&D loads. After the Northridge earthquake, we had to handle a lot of different waste streams. We were able to recycle 92% of the C&D at first, when it was primarily concrete. Then the percentage dropped to the low 80s, when the loads were primarily from interior remodeling. The current percentage recycled is in the mid 70s.

We use screens to separate the material into various sizes and waste streams. The wood goes to be burned in power plants in the San Joaquin Valley and/or an MDF plant in Riverside. We separate the dirt from small rocks and organics. The organics, which are mainly leaves and small wood chips, we sell to a compost company that bags it and sells it to farmers and gardeners for growing products. We pull out bricks by hand. The rock and concrete goes to a grinding facility to become crushed miscellaneous base. We take waste gypsum from new construction and manufacturing plants, grind it by itself, separate out the paper, and sell the gypsum to farmers for soil amendment. The paper goes into the compost, which improves the compost. We recycle just about everything except pieces of brick.

We are now installing a new facility that handles 1,000 tons per day, and we can soon go to 1,500 tons per day, with feeder yards in Los Angeles.

Questions

Q: Is Nu-Way a landfill? Do you have a lawsuit with the CIWMB?

Workman: It is a mine reclamation project. It takes landfill-type materials, which are creating a good base for development. We have no lawsuit, but we are working with CIWMB to solve the issue of whether the material is classified as disposal or as a beneficial use. We are working on legislation to clarify this.

Q: Is C&D considered restricted waste in waste assessments? Does all recycling count, or is it included in the base year? Do we get a 1 for 1 credit in diversion?

A: It is disallowed in the base year, but the growth since the base year is allowed.

Q: How many shifts does it take to handle 1,000 tons per day, and what is the approximate cost per ton.

Richardson: It takes 2 shifts. I do not know the cost figures. We currently have about 6 people on the primary platform and 6 on the secondary. We increase that when big jobs come in. Recently, we ran on Saturdays and Sundays & almost added a third shift to handle a big job. We are looking for a site for another facility on the Westside. The difficulty with sites in the San Gabriel Valley is they are too close to Puente hills which is so cheap to dump in.

Report from the CIWMB on C&D Recycling Statewide

Kathleen Gildred: We want to thank Senator Roberti for being here. After being a member of the state legislature for 28 years, including President Pro Tem of the Senate for 18 years, he was appointed to the CIWMB in 1998. Following are excerpts from his talk. To see the full text of his prepared remarks, click here.

Senator David Roberti, Member of the CIWMB:

I am disappointed that the Construction, Demolition and Inert Waste regulations were not adopted by the CIWMB. However, this delay provides you with additional opportunities to tell me, the other Board members, and our staff, what could make the regulations better.

The CIWMB approach to C&D is:

1. Reduce amount of waste generated

2. Facilitate collection of reusable materials

3. Fuel the purchase of the recycled products

We want to affect the original design of buildings, reduce wastes as they are constructed and then change the ways they are retired. We encourage deconstruction rather than demolition. This can increase profits as well as save landfill space. The amount of debris generated in a demolition activity ranges from 100 to 180 pounds per square foot. The problem is few workers have the skills and tools necessary to dismantle a building so that the integrity of the materials are preserved. If workers can be trained to use efficient, economical methods to deconstruct buildings, a large quantity of construction material could be recovered.

We are working with Kaufman and Broad who are replacing 1,200 former military housing units on the former Mather Field Air Base in Sacramento with single family homes. They are working with the local redevelopment agency to have some of the houses used in a deconstruction training project. This will bring more people into workforce as well as creating a training curriculum for deconstruction technology throughout the state. In addition, they will break up old driveways to be reused for road base, driveways, curbs and gutters on site. They will also aid sustainability by recycling old tires in rubberized asphalt concrete.

We are working with professional boards that license contractors, architects, and engineers, to develop construction and demolition questions in their licensing exams. This in turn will increase the awareness of construction and demolition issues in the next generation of building professionals. It is our hope that waste prevention and recycling strategies will be incorporated in the design and production of buildings and large developments, as a matter of course.

We started recently to post local construction ordinances on our website as examples for you, including:

– The City of Cotati requires a refundable deposit which is returned after the builder shows proof of reuse or recycling. They also must advertise when salvage materials will be available.

– Sacramento requires that a recyclable collection system be built into any commercial or large residential development.

– Palo Alto requires that 25% of the generated garbage be recycled as part of the project.

I encourage you to ask the leaders in your communities to support these types of ordinances, and to develop the one which is right for your city. Recycling should be required on all projects, as we move toward a mindset that all our resources are precious and must be protected.

We are also trying to facilitate the collection of C&D waste through our recycling market development zone program (RMDZ). We have made $4.5 million in loans to C & D recycling-related businesses over the last five years. Most of these loans focused on crushing asphalt, concrete and ceramic materials, as alternatives to mined aggregate. As a result of those loans, we are diverting about 1.5 million tons of materials every year!

Other efforts by the Board include promoting sustainable or “green” building practices. These result in:

1. The creation of less waste

2. Markets for recycled-content building products

3. Lower costs over the life of the building.

Additionally, we developed a reference manual, in conjunction with the City of Los Angeles, which includes an annotated listing of recycled content building products, strategies for reusing and reducing materials in construction, and managing job site waste. It has fact sheets on subjects such as drywall recycling, asphalt pavement recycling, lumber waste recycling, carpet recycling, a list of construction and demolition recyclers and processors, a military base closure manual, and the Community Environmental Council report on the construction and demolition industry.

Relative to legislation, Senator Chesbro’s SB 515 clarifies that there would be no $1.34 fee levied on inert wastes placed at mine reclamation sites for the past and until January, 2002. Such disposal will not hurt or embellish jurisdictions’ diversion rates.

Other pertinent legislation is related to the State’s responsibility to model its commitment to buying recycled, and to design and build state offices in a “green,” or sustainable manner. Senator Sher’s SB 827 directs CalTrans to use recycled materials for road sub-base.

Assemblymember Strom-Martin’s bill, AB 75, requires that every State agency make an “integrated waste management plan,” similar to the plans required of every city. The biggest difference is that these state plans must also include their commitment to use “green building” practices.

Q: The impact of having inert fills be required for a tiered permit would mean that municipalities have to count that as going to landfills. Is there an adjustment mechanism? We are now counting 1 million tons per year of inert materials as diverted.

Roberti: My general feeling is that counting retroactively would be unfair. I think that up to 2002 there should be no counting as diversion and no fee. My philosophy is that inert land fill is still landfill. We want to have incentives to reduce waste and increase recycling. That won’t happen if you can landfill without penalty just because it is inert. The CIWMB is not a zoning agency, but we are concerned about grading and structure of landfills. What about a earthquake? Do we have liability for destruction of anything on that site because CIWMB signed off on the landfill?

Tour of Sanitation District’s Pilot Project on C&D Recycling

Joe Houghton, L.A. County Sanitation Districts:

We are doing a pilot project at the Puente Hills landfill to see if we can use C&D waste as part of our ADC. We have been using a CBI grinder for greenwaste and were told that it would also grind up C&D debris. We tried it, and found it seemed to work well, so we got a second CBI grinder to use for C&D.

We have a spotter who looks for trucks with a lot of wood and direct them to this area. First it goes through a prescreener that filters out the small particles and dirt. Then it goes on a convey belt with spotters that pull out the large pieces of metal. Then it goes into the grinder, after which it goes through another conveyor with a magnet that pulls out the metal pieces.

We have found that mixing the ground up C&D with ground up greenwaste decreases the offensive odor and emphasizes a pine tree type of smell.

We are also looking at this combination for alternate intermediate cover (AIC) which we use for areas that we are not going to use for 6 months.

We have a capacity of about 1000 tons per day of greenwaste and 100-600 tons per day for C&D. (We handle 13,000 tons per day for the entire landfill.

Q; How much greenwaste do you use for ADC?

A: We use about 12 inches for ADC and the same for AIC with about 12 inches of soil on top for vehicle traffic.

Q: Do you credit cities for ADC?

A: Yes.

Q: Do you have a reduced fee for greenwaste?

A: Yes.

Q: When Spadra landfill closes, can you handle all the greenwaste?

A: Yes, but we do not do composting (we are concerned with odors). (We have homes about 2,500 feet from our landfill.) We want other facilities to handle some of the greenwaste. We would like the cities to develop their own composting facilities.

Increasing Commercial Diversion

Tuesday, April 20, L.A. County Sanitation Districts,
Organized by the Southern California Council on Environment and Development
[Summary report prepared by Jim Stewart]

WELCOME AND PURPOSE OF FORUM

Joe Haworth , Public Information Officer for the Sanitation Districts of L.A. County: We welcome you. The Districts are pleased to be a supporter of SCCED.

Kathleen Gildred , Director of SCCED: This forum is a follow-up to the “Getting to 50%” conference we held in June 1998, which was designed to help municipalities achieve 50% diversion by 2000. Following that conference we sent out a questionnaire to get your priority interests, which we have used to plan this forum series.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Dr. Eugene Tseng , UCLA Extension Waste Management and Recycling Program: We are reporting preliminary findings on the first thousand waste audits of businesses. Waste prevention/recycling provides big cost savings. Go after big businesses first. The larger 20% of businesses have 90% of any additional potential diversion.

Lupe Maria Vela , Director, Solid Resources Citywide Recycling Division, Bureau of Sanitation, Los Angeles Department of Public Works: We established partnerships with businesses and developed over 50 publications to provide guidance for commercial recycling, accomplishing 45% citywide diversion for 1995.

Dean Richardson , Raytheon Hughes West: We are now at a 35% diversion rate, our goal is 50% for this year and we are going for 70% the following year. We recycled white paper and cardboard and achieved a diversion rate of 21%, with revenue/cost avoidance of $25,000. In 1998 we diverted or recycled nearly 500 tons of solid waste, scrap metal and surplus equipment for a savings of over $750,000.

Bruce Dolezal , Gillette Company PaperMate Division: We recycle all metals, oil, and plastics. We have found recycled pallets cost effective. The overall result is 80% diversion. We have also had a 95% reduction in hazardous emissions since 1987.

Joe Sloan , Director of Market Development for Consolidated Disposal: A hauler can: (1) Spread the message about recycling/diversion, (2) Provide separate pickup of recyclables, (3) Direct the material into a MRF, which can recover 25-40%.

Mark Harmon , Integrated Waste Manager for the City of Claremont: A successful commercial recycling program is a partnership between the public agency, commercial customer and the hauler, with one goal: Develop a cost-effective customer friendly, environmentally responsible, operationally feasible and legally compliant program.

WORKING WITH BUSINESSES

Jaime Lozano , City of Carson Waste Management Specialist: Carson has a proactive AB 939 compliance program, concentrating on public-private partnerships. This means we must get the cooperation of the business sector and the haulers.

Dr. Eugene Tseng, has worked with the CIWMB on quantification methodologies, to identify how much diversion is actually occurring. He has worked with the USEPA, United Nations, China and elsewhere in designing and teaching these methods.

Survey of 1,000 Businesses on Potential Source Reduction and Diversion

Dr. Eugene Tseng , UCLA Extension Waste Management and Recycling Program:

We have completed 2,000 waste audits of businesses. I am reporting our preliminary findings on the first thousand businesses.

The waste management hierarchy is (in order of decreasing desirability):

1. Source Reduction , which includes Waste Prevention, Waste Minimization, Reuse and Repair, and Improved Durability

2. Recycling, which includes Pre-Consumer Recycling (Internal Recycling), Post-Consumer Recycling, and Composting

3a. Environmentally-Safe Transformation , such as Waste-to-Energy (Incineration, etc.) to use the “energy content” of solid waste

3b. Environmentally-Safe Landfilling

Diversion is classified as #1 and #2, but Transformation (such as Waste-to-Energy) and Biomass is eligible for Year 2000, under certain conditions.

According to CIWMB Regulation 30 PRC 40196: “Source Reduction” means any action which causes a net reduction in the generation of solid waste. “Source reduction” includes, but is not limited to, reducing the use of nonrecyclable materials, replacing disposable materials and products with reusable materials and products, reducing packaging, reducing the amount of yard wastes generated, establishing garbage rate structures with incentives to reduce the amount of wastes that generators produce, and increasing the efficiency of the use of paper, cardboard, glass, metal, plastic, and other materials. “Source reduction” does not include steps taken after the material becomes solid waste or actions which would impact air or water resources in lieu of land, including, but not limited to, transformation.

We are currently working with CIWMB on the methodology of establishing a new base year for 2000, because the present base year data are faulty for many jurisdictions.

Our research goals in the UCLA Waste Management and Recycling Program are to: develop recommended approaches, do sampling/targeting of various types of business, develop audit protocols, and collect and analyze data. We want to learn how to quantify source reduction and diversion and how to tie the calculations to the jurisdiction’s calculation methodologies. We also want to identify exemplary business programs, such as Disney, which is trying to reduce waste by 50% through source reduction.

Purposes of a Waste Reduction and Recycling Review include:

1. Reducing Costs through reduced disposal costs, more efficient use of materials, and reduced liability (e.g., less hazardous wastes).

2. Corporate Greening through use of non- or low-toxic substitute materials, use of recycled content feedstock, product design for increased recyclability, process design for minimum waste.

Process of an audit includes analysis of:

• Shipping / Receiving / Inventory Control

• Materials Utilization, including type of materials and efficiency of use

• Waste Management and Collection Procedures

• Recycling Practices, including:
Disposal Practices / Contamination Issues
Waste Characterization
Disposal Sites Utilized
Service Costs

• Environmental Management Infrastructure, including:
Corporate Policy and Commitment
Management Organization
Education and Outreach Efforts

The audit looks at each function where trash is created, asking the following questions:
• What is the material?
• Who and what generated the material?
• How and why was it generated?
• Could it be avoided altogether?
• Could it be reduced?
• Could it be recycled?
• What is the best “disposal option”?
• Factors to consider include:
a) recycled content
b) designing for recyclability
c) designing for minimum waste

We have verified the theory that if you concentrate on the largest 20% of the businesses, you will be dealing with nearly 80% of the total commercial waste. Jurisdictions with large businesses will have 40-80% of the existing commercial diversion. Additional potential diversion businesses can do themselves could add 5-15%. Smaller jurisdictions with smaller businesses have 25-40% existing diversion rate, with an additional potential diversion of 3-10%.

Summary of lessons learned:
1. Waste prevention can be a significant help. With an average existing internal diversion rate of 25% already being accomplished by the businesses, only an additional 25% of the waste stream must be diverted to reach 50% diversion. For haulers that guarantee a 50% diversion rate, it is only fair to give credit to the hauler for the diversion that has already taken place before they pick up the trash.

2. Waste prevention/recycling provides big cost savings.

3. Hauler recycling accounts for a small percentage (less than 10%) of the actual diversion, the other 90% is internal diversion.

4. Go after big businesses first. The larger 20% of the businesses have 90% of any additional potential diversion.

5. Could do a regional MRF to increase diversion in smaller businesses because it may not be cost effective for individual small businesses to set up recycling programs.

We are doing audit training sessions with CIWMB staff and could do similar training for city and county staff. Scheduled date is June 28 to 30, 1999 in the Los Angeles Area. Please contact Eugene Tseng for participation in the training session with CIWMB staff on conducting Waste Reduction and Recycling Audits.

Los Angeles Strategies for Commercial Recycling

Lupe Maria Vela , Director, Solid Resources Citywide Recycling Division, Bureau of Sanitation, Los Angeles Department of Public Works:

Following a 1995 analysis of overall city waste composition by generator, the Los Angeles City Council decided to emphasize commercial and residential recycling. The Integrated Solid Waste Management office has developed a lot of recycling programs. Susana Reyes heads up the program which is encouraging all City departments to buy recycled products.

The Solid Resources Citywide Recycling Division was created in 1998, with 26 staff from various groups, including ISWMD, to oversee citywide recycling programs.

Our responsibilities include:
• AB 939 monitoring and report preparation
• Oversight of AB 939 implementation in all City departments
• Providing commercial, industrial and multi-family recycling assistance
• Recycling organics contact and marketing activities (we are looking at developing our own composting/mulching operation run by city employees)
• Household hazardous waste and used oil collection program
• Market development for recycled materials and products
• Biosolids contract development and education

City Approach : We started in 1990 to look at generation, disposal and diversion. We targeted 24 generator groups and established 24 working groups, hotels, grocers, schools, etc. The groups develop their own targets and decide how they can help, we do not mandate. We targeted 6 groups per year and have established partnerships and developed over 50 publications to provide guidance to businesses in the various generator groups. We have published a Recycling Resources Catalog with an order form for our publications, nearly all of which are free. You also may use them for your municipality, as long as you give us report credit.

We have spent a lot of effort on monitoring and uating results. We have surveyed 1200 diversion facilities and 300 disposal companies so we have a good idea of the recylclables and solid waste flow in the city. From 1995 through 1997 we have disposed about 3.5 million tons each year, so it is about constant even though population is increasing. Our diversion is improving, in 1995, it was 44.5%, in 1996, 46.1%, and in 1997, 46.6%. Our 1995 AB 939 report cost $75 for consultants, but it is free to cities. The City government diverted only 29% in 1995, but the commercial/industrial sectors diverted 71%.

Strategies Beyond 95 :
• Maximize commercial diversion programs, working with CMRA recycling association
• Focus on C&D and paper recycling
• Focus on the 19 major City departments
• Emphasize offices, schools, grocers, printing and multi-family buildings
• Prioritize source reduction/reuse programs
• Buying recycled is a crucial part of any program
• Documentation
• Staff development so they are familiar with a variety of issues
Our 2000 strategy was developed in 1998:
• Office building promotional campaign, in which we look at successful offices and ask them to be co-sponsors and join in leading the campaign to involve the 1000 largest office buildings
• Waste characterization/diversion studies (2 year effort, 2000-2001), in which we will sample 1400 businesses of all types
• Reuse/take back outreach, starting with electronics, we will ask large retailers to get out information to the public on where to take electronics back for reuse. This should be a regional program which we invite other cities to join
• Concentrate on targeted materials: C&D and paper
• Institutional recycling in schools
• Smart gardening, including composting, grasscycling, may 22 we launch “mow down pollution,” featuring mulching mowers at Home Depot
• Buy recycled programs and market development

Summary of Results:
• Diverted 46.6% in 1997
• Established recycling business network, our guidebooks have all been done in partnership with businesses
• Award winning programs, including the CIWMB Trash Cutters award in 1998, selection as one of 32 “Best Practices models in the U.S., 1999 best organics program, CRRA

Future Outlook:
• More positive State legislative environment, including SB 332 expansion of the bottle bill to include all bottles, SB 110 strengthening recycled plastic content in food and cosmetic containers
• Stronger City Council positions, including resolution condemning the Miller Beer composite metal/plastic bottle (it has 2 PET layers and 3 other types of plastic with a metal cap and a metal label. Councilmember Ruth Galanter’s resolution said the City would submit a bill to Miller for the additional cost of recycling. Miller’s response so far was to say they would add 25% recycled plastic content.
• City’s aim for 70% diversion/recycling by 2020
• Integrate other issues into workshops, including pesticide concerns, storm water pollution, buying recycled
• Look for source reduction opportunities

Lozano: Fox Electronics of San Jose will accept shipments of old electronics, if we are willing to pay the shipping costs.

Report from Businesses on How We Reduced Waste and Saved Money

Dean Richardson , Raytheon Hughes:

Raytheon Hughes West is now at a 35% diversion rate, our goal is 50% for this year and we are going for 70% the following year.

Our driving force is not AB 939, is not being green and is not even cost savings (because often it takes money to save money). Our driver is intra company competition. Our new Vice President says the Texas Instruments Division recycles 70-90%, “Why aren’t we doing that?”

In 1994 I tried to develop a corporate wide recycling program, but couldn’t get anywhere — our diversion rate was 6%. Then in 1997 Raytheon became part of General Motors and developed a national solid waste contract. Management pushed recycling as revenue source (from reduced waste collection), not for waste reduction.

In the first year, with no budget or resources, we recycled white paper and cardboard and achieved a diversion rate of 21%, with revenue/cost avoidance of $25,000. In 1998 we diverted 31%, recycled 2,013 tons of solid waste, for a cost avoidance of $44,000. We won some awards, we became sponsors of America Recycles Day.

This year we put 2 containers in every office cubicle, for trash and for recyclables. Our goal for 1999 is 50%. We are doing recycling, source reduction, subcontract restructuring , communication, benchmarking. We are expecting a cost avoidance of $58,000. We are going beyond white paper to recycling anything that tears. We have involved the janitorial staff. To go beyond that we need some seed money, which is hard to get.

In terms of source reduction, we have asked our office supplies vendor Boise Cascade to provide recyclable office supplies. We are also requiring 2-sided copying and use of electronic mail (we are not distributing office phone books, making directories available only on email). Cardboard recycling has gone from 193 tons in 1998 to an expected 312 tons in 1999. Our cafeteria tray reuse program is saving 9,000 pounds/month, for a $4,000 cost avoidance. We have asked Boise Cascade to use reusable supplies distribution containers, to eliminate cardboard shipping boxes. We also have asked our landscaping services contract to recycle greenwaste, and leave grass clippings on the ground. We recycled 56 tons of scrap metal for a savings of $27,000. Recycling surplus equipment was about 410 tons for a savings of $688,493.

The key is strong management support. Our CEO Dan Burnham is aggressive on the environment and on safety issues. Also important is communications with the employees and vendors to reduce waste. Benchmarking is helpful. We are using the OPM scoring system in which we multiply the amount for each of the categories by a weighting factor to track our progress. Awards and commendations are very helpful, such as the WRAP award.

Bruce Dolezal , Gillette Company PaperMate Division:

The Santa Monica PaperMate Division produces over 1 billion writing instruments annually using 300,000 square feet of space. Gillette’s mission for years has included the statement: “Our products will be safe to make and to use, we will conserve natural resources and will continue to invest in a better environment.”

Each manufacturing facility business plan has critical success factors which include hazardous waste reduction, energy conservation/optimization, recycling programs, etc. We look at each waste stream to determine the quantity of waste generated, where it can be recycled, the cost to recycle, the cost to dispose, the cost to replace, and the overall total cost savings from recycling. For example, we have the plastic waste from the mold runner recycled at the machine instantly. Rejects from the manufacturing process are ground up and recycled at the plant.

We are driven by doing the right thing. For example, machine and hydraulic oil is recycled in-house. We have found recycled pallets cost effective. We recycle all metals. Even extruded PVC has some markets. We reuse corrugated tote containers until they fall apart. Whenever we are doing construction or remodeling, we recycle everything we can. Customer returns are ground up and sent to a waste-to-energy facility. We will accept bulk shipments of disposable razors and recycle the materials. Our office recycling program mixes all the paper together for convenience, rather than separate out white and colored paper.

The overall result is 80% diversion. We have also had a 95% reduction in hazardous emissions since 1987. We have eliminated use of ozone depleting compounds. We also have a ride sharing program.

We have made significant reductions in overall product packaging since 1990. We have just produced the “Eco-pen,” made from recycled materials. We have increased energy efficiency 40% and water efficiency 51% since 1990.

WORKING WITH HAULERS

Kim Braun , Solid Waste Manager for the City of Santa Monica: Working with haulers is important because to get our city diversion rate up, we have to ensure the private haulers are doing the diversion from commercial facilities.

How Haulers Can Help Increase Commercial Diversion

Joe Sloan , Director of Market Development for Consolidated Disposal:

We have designed and implemented many waste programs including specialized pickups, commingled recyclables, and dirty MRFs. Our industry is basically a transportation business, so we are similar to the Post Office, UPS, or any delivery company.

As someone said, we create trash with capitalism and collect it with socialism.

Haulers can help you with commercial diversion. The challenge is to make it work for both the hauler and the business. Business people look at the bottom line.

We can pick up most efficiently on routes where the customers are most dense, and we have uniform containers so we can use the same vehicles. In our survey of 5,000 customers, we found 45% of our revenue from 60% of our customers have us pick up 1 or 2 3-yard bins once a week.

Only 10% of commercial diversion is attributed to the hauler, but most of your ordinances, permits are directed to the hauler. But haulers find all the recyclable plums are already picked out of the commercial trash, so there is nothing of value left in the trash.

Avon saved $90,000 per year doing recycling, but small generators cannot achieve this large amount of savings. If a customer used a 3-yard container, we could give two 1.5-yard containers instead to separate plastic, white paper from the trash, it will actually cost him more because we need to send two trucks to the same place. In the last 12 years there was only one brief time when the value of recyclables exceeded the cost of pickup.

Haulers can provide some technical services, but the municipalities should hire consultants to do this. A hauler can:
1. Spread the message about recycling/diversion.
2. Provide separate pickup of containers for recyclables, even if it costs more (or you can provide the hauler with a reduced rate structure for recycling services if you wish).
3. Direct the material into a MRF, which can recover 25-40% of a mixed commercial waste stream. This is the cheapest way to get the diversion because we only have to pick up one container.

Question: Is 25% recycling from a MRF typical?

Sloan: Yes, because businesses have already pulled out the recyclables from the waste stream. The MRF provides the lowest cost per ton. La Mirada, Norwalk, and San Gabriel require waste to go through a MRF

Question: Isn’t diversion reducing the hauler’s income?

Sloan: Haulers have implemented a lot of recycling programs, but gross revenues have still increased. The new legislative requirements make it more difficult for the smaller haulers.

Working with Haulers from the Public Sector Perspective

Mark Harmon , Integrated Waste Manager for the City of Claremont:

Our department has 25 employees that provide:
• Full service trash and recycling collection program 7 days a week.
• Commingled recycled program with MRF-processed recyclables.
• Variable sanitation rate with recycling costs as part of the commercial rates, so there is no separate fee for recycling. We charge people on basis of how often we pick up. If you add fees for recycling, it is a disincentive. We think everybody should pay for the programs to implement recycling. (If you don’t separate out the recycling fee, you can keep away from Prop 218 problems.)
• Full cost accounting system. Our Enterprise Fund means we have to recover all of our expenses from the customers.

The program has three players:
• Commercial customers who want a clean, efficient service at a cost comparable to neighboring businesses and/or communities. The recycling program is perceived as environment-friendly thing to do.
• Haulers who want full cost recovery for collection services and compliance with municipal contracts. Quality customer service is important to them, but the companies answer more to Wall St. (or company headquarters), not to Main St. (or the local community).
• The public agency which is concerned with public policy and law, legislative compliance (AB 939, etc.) and environmental responsibility. They are sensitive to rate impacts on commercial customers (because it may affect the tax rolls).

All three meet in the middle with the same goal: Develop a cost-effective customer friendly, environmentally responsible, operationally feasible and legally compliant commercial recycling program.

Steps toward achieving this goal include:
1. Identify your waste stream and the business composition of your community. Look at your SRRE and waste audits. Decide what materials to target. The majority of commercial recyclables are usually one or two commodity types. After you identify those, focus on the businesses that produce the highest percentage of these materials.
2. Clearly define your measurable diversion goal, it can be a percentage, tonnage or participation rate.
3. Create a partnership with your hauler to develop programs to meet your goals. Be prepared to discuss program options, contract modifications, and rate impacts. If a dirty MRF that costs $70/ton is too expensive, what about a clean MRF? In terms of rate impacts, do you want a low rate or do you want to increase it a little to add recycling pickup? Don’t ask a hauler to accept the value of recyclable materials as full payment, the market for these commodities is too unstable.
4. Present the program to City Council and the business community (include the Chamber of Commerce). Explain how the program works, prepare printed materials. Educate business community as to the:
– environmental benefits
– diversion goals
– rate impacts
5. Measure success of the program.

In conclusion, a successful commercial recycling program is a partnership between the public agency, commercial customer and the hauler. An appropriate recycling program should address the concerns or needs of all the players.

Buying Recycled and Eco-Friendly Products Workshop

Part of the City of El Monte Recycled Content Fair

Thursday, September 27

Workshop sponsored by the L.A. County Sanitation Districts

Arranged by the Southern California Council on Environment & Development (SCCED)

Executive Summary

Overview on Buying Recycled and Eco-Friendly Products: Andrew Basmajian, Environmental Programs Division, City of Santa Monica (310) 458-2227. Our areas of purchasing success include: cleaning supplies, recycled content products, vehicle maintenance products, low emission paints, alternative fuel vehicles, integrated pest control, energy and water conservation, renewable energy, and more.

Using Policies and Bid Specifications to Purchase Recycled Products: Dean Hartwell, Integrated Waste Management, City of Glendale (818) 548-3916, Ext. 8645. We purchase recycled copier paper, rubberized asphalt, speed bumps, and wheel stops. All compost bins we distribute are 100% recycled plastic.

Cooperative Purchasing of Recycled Paper: George De La O, Los Angeles County Dept. of Public Works (626) 458-5184. The LA County Program enables any government agency in Los Angeles County to purchase recycled bond paper at a reduced price through an open contract. Contact Robert B. Krost at (562) 698-1199, Ext. 514.

Green Building Construction Using Recycled Products: Lupe Maria Vela, Project Manager, AB 939 Sustainability Partnership, City of Los Angeles. We have a 10% Price Preference Ordinance for certain recycled-content products. Our Sustainable Design Program will plan 19 new fire stations and 8 new animal shelters to make them green.

Resources for Buying Recycled Products: Jim Stewart, SCCED (310) 390-4366. We have prepared selected lists of buy-recycled websites, email listserves, and other resources, including phone numbers of some vendors not available via the Internet. Please see the Appendix to this report.

Other Important Workshop Presentations at the El Monte Fair

Purchase Recycled-Content Products — It’s a Good Thing: JoAnn Jaschke, State Agency Buy Recycled Campaign (SABRC), CIWMB, (916) 341-6477. We outline guidelines for implementing a successful buy recycled program, and the state requirements for purchasing recycled content products. There is also a list of helpful websites.

The State of California Property Reuse Program: Ed McKendry, California Department of General Services (DGS) Procurement Division, Property Reuse Section (714) 449-5891. The Department of General Services Surplus Property Reutilization Program makes salvage and surplus property from State and Federal agencies available to other State and local agencies and qualified non-profit organizations.

Summaries of Speaker Presentations

Overview on Buying Recycled and Eco-Friendly Products: Andrew Basmajian, Environmental Programs Division, City of Santa Monica.

We define green purchasing as environmentally preferable products, that are:

  • less hazardous, less toxic,
  • resource efficient,
  • less polluting,
  • have recycled content,
  • have reusability, durability, good design, high quality (quality products will last longer)

Our green purchasing program came from our Sustainable City program, which was initiated by staff in 1991, adopted by City Council in 1994. The program goals include: – establish measurable targets

  • Reduce Resource Consumption
  • Reduce Waste and Pollution
  • Protect Human Health and the Environment

Areas of purchasing success include:

  • Safer custodial cleaning supplies: we now look at every chemical we use, we have replaced 120 chemicals with about 50 safer mainly citrus-based products.
  • Recycled content products, including paper, office products, motor oil, street surfacing materials, paint, trash can liners, etc. We are looking to use 100% post-consumer paper for City letterhead.
  • Environmentally friendly vehicle maintenance products, including replacing ethylene glycol antifreeze with propylene glycol, aqueous parts washing solutions eliminate carcinogenic cleaners, re-refined motor oil, oil filters are disassembled and recycled by a company in Burbank. We use solely retread tires for large trucks, but we can’t get quality retread tires for passenger cars.
  • Facilities Maintenance: including low emission paints with lower VOC content, no rainforest wood.
  • Street Maintenance: refurbishing paved alleys with new machinery that eliminates the need for wood forms.

– Alternative fuel vehicles, including natural gas powered trash trucks.

– Integrated pest control services: by looking at the way pests behave, and interfering with their lives, we have nearly eliminated use of pesticides.

  • Energy conservation: we use energy conserving heating and air conditioning systems, compact fluorescent bulbs and guidelines for new construction.
  • Water conservation: we have centralized control of watering in every park, so we can ensure there is no watering during a rain.

– Renewable sources of electricity: all municipal buildings are powered with electricity from a geothermal plant, with no global warming emissions. The additional cost has been paid from the savings by installing compact fluorescent light bulbs.

Green purchasing is based on:

– Ordinances, such as the one banning purchase rainforest woods.

– Council-adopted policies, such as alternative fuel vehicles and renewable energy.

– Administrative policies (this is our primary implementation strategy, it is not directed or mandated by City Council, but they are supportive of our approach).

For example, we have implemented some purchasing restrictions to limit what employees can buy. We tell Office Depot to restrict availability of non-recycled content products.

Implementation methods

Implementation methods can be simple or complex. You can have a single criterion for a single product, or you can have multiple criteria involving multiple products, with a citywide bid process. The Environmental Programs Division staff work within the existing City purchasing process and partner with buyers, upper management and end users. We conduct research, test products, develop specifications, and train end users. It takes a long time

Obstacles we have overcome included:

– “Low bid” — We decided to define that as the “lowest responsible bid,” so it can include environmental attributes and performance criteria as well as cost.

– Employee resistance to change — We provided training and education. We told custodians we were concerned with their health and they got enthusiastic about the new non-toxic cleaning products. (One window washer in a commercial building lost an eye using ammonia-based cleaners.) We explained to the truck drivers the benefits of natural gas fuel, so they weren’t so concerned about the reduced power.

– Product performance — We did research and testing to find out the products and methods of use that worked best. We overcame the myths about recycled paper. We found out that some custodians had never been trained at all for their jobs. Terrycloth wiping rags made the green cleaners more effective.

Keys to success were:

– Get support from the top. Get a manager with vision committed.

– Include end users in the decision making process, involvement is key. This was the first time anyone had asked the custodians for their opinion.

– Do detailed research and testing. We let them test the re-refined oil in a couple of vehicles first.

– Implement a pilot program first, using some of your most experienced, yet open-minded staff.

– Train end users in the best ways to use the products. We took them to the beach to show them where the toxic cleaners and pesticides would wind up.

  • Be flexible, and change direction if needed. We found out there were no effective non-toxic floor strippers, so we are still using the old products for that.
  • Follow-up is critical. For example, the Big Blue Bus surveys customers and employees to uate progress at the end of every three year period.

Using Policies and Bid Specifications to Purchase Recycled Products: Dean Hartwell, Integrated Waste Management, City of Glendale, (818) 548-3916 Ext. 8645.

We have a full range of recycling collection and education programs. We teach the community about the importance of recycling, so we feel we have to buy recycled-content products. In 1992, our City Manager issued a “Recycled-Content Procurement Policy Directive, which called for an annual report on the types and quantities of purchased recycled products, experience with the performance of those products and efforts to increase the purchase of such products. In 1997, this directive was incorporated into the City’s Administrative Policy Manual.

These reports have proven useful in increasing the awareness of recycled-content products, and many recycled products are now purchased, including recycled rubberized asphalt, speed bumps, and wheel stops. As long as recycled copier paper costs less than 5% more, we have to buy recycled paper.

The bad news is we have lacked accurate reporting, because our purchasing software can not give us the reports we want.

However, we expect to be specifying a wide range of recycled products in the construction of our new Recycling Center, including carpet, ceiling tiles, paint, countertops, insulation, wallboard, floor tiles and restroom partitions. All compost bins we distribute are 100% recycled plastic. We also have lunch tote bags made from 100% post-consumer plastic soft drink bottles. I have copies of the purchase order we submitted to Weisenbach Specialty Printing in Columbus, Ohio, for the bags.

Cooperative Purchasing of Recycled Paper: George De La O, Los Angeles County Dept. of Public Works (626) 458-5184.

The LA County Procurement Programs and Cooperatives enables any government agency in Los Angeles County to purchase recycled bond paper at a reduced price through an open contract.

The Los Angeles County Dept. of Public Works has been working on many programs for AB 939, such as residential and commercial recycling. We realized we needed to stimulate the market for recycled-content products. In 1990 the LA County Board of Supervisors passed authorized the purchase of recycled materials, if there was no additional cost. But in 1999 they approved the comprehensive step to have all County agencies purchase 30% post-consumer-content paper even if it cost up to 10% more than virgin paper. The County uses two million sheets of paper per day,

We put on bids and selected Spicers Paper in Santa Fe Springs. We are ordering 80,000 cases per year, and saving $40,000 per year. There are a total of 26 cities already in the partnership, including the City of LA, ordering over 180,000 cases a year, nearly a billion sheets of paper. By having all this paper be 30% post-consumer-content, we are saving 33,000 trees, 13 million gallons of water, and 9 megawatt-hours of electricity per year. We have received awards from the National Association of Counties and the California Integrated Waste Management Board.

We have sent notices to all the mayors, inviting them to participate and we invite you to join.

There is no minimum order, you can order as little as one case, and it will be delivered by the next business day for no extra cost. From 1 to 39 cases of white 8 1/2 x 11 costs $22.49 per case, if paid in 30 days. There are further price breaks for larger orders. Legal and 11 x 17 white paper, plus 8 1/2 x 11 color paper is also available.

Contact Robert B. Krost at (562) 698-1199, Ext. 514, at Spicers Paper, 12310 E. Slauson Avenue, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670. Just tell him you want to order recycled bond paper under the L.A. County contract.

Green Building Construction Using Recycled Products: Lupe Maria Vela, AB 939 Sustainability Partnership, City of Los Angeles, (213) 473-7896.

Sustainability

All of us need to be concerned about the overall issues of sustainability. To be effective, we need to talk with the various people concerned with waste water, air quality, storm water, solid waste, recycling and learn about the whole spectrum of environmental issues and how they interrelate.

What we have learned about recycled-content products:

• Use Council policies and ordinances as appropriate, but administrative policies are the primary means of implementation.

• Product performance, cost and quality are important.

• Supplier integrity and experience is crucial.

• Adequate in-house staffing is necessary.

• Education of staff and the public is important (but it is often hard to get such soft programs approved by the City Council).

• Documentation of progress helps identify problem areas that need attention, as well as enabling you to report successes to leaders.

Important trends:

• We are moving beyond just recycling to look at recycled-content purchasing.

• We must no longer focus on single issues, but look at the entire picture, talking to other environmental specialists and making linkages.

• The City budget is shrinking, so collaboration with other departments is key to success.

• We need to look at the concept of sustainability as a means to integrate various environmental issues.

City of LA Recycled-Content Purchasing Program updates:

• Recycled Product Ordinance was passed in 1992.

• 10% Price Preference Ordinance for recycled-content products was passed in 1994.

• Department of General Service’s Buy Recycled 2000 Directive (issued in 1999) mandated purchases of recycled materials in 18 categories of products, including paper, plastic, paint, asphalt, etc.

• City Hardwood Policy mandates only purchases of wood approved by the Certified Forest Products Council as having been grown sustainably.

• Mayor’s Executive Directive 2001-33 on Recycling Programs establishes the goal of 70% diversion from landfills. It mandates annual departmental plans including establishing departmental goals to buy post-consumer recycled products and reusable products, identifying source reduction and recycling opportunities, such as requiring vendors to take back packaging.

• The City’s Sustainable Design Program is directed by a new City Architect who is also an advocate of green design. We are designing 19 new fire stations and 8 animal shelters with an additional 7% funding to make them green. We will try to incorporate green practices into the design of all 32 new libraries.

• The Draft Green Building LA Initiative provides strategies for employees and residents on how to make the City greener.

• The City’s Deconstruction Pilot Project involves an ongoing uation of the reuse and costs of construction materials. (Sponsored by Library and Environmental Affairs)

• Green Residential Program and source books have been prepared for the Housing Department with assistance from Global Green and Environmental Affairs. Global Green can help you put together a green resource guide for your city.

Green Building Products with recycled content:

• Are the fastest growing segment of recycled content products.

• Have much improved products and companies.

• Are being integrated into green building policies and practices.

The best way to involve architects and design engineers in using recycled content is to look at construction products by type of application (which are called “Divisions”). For example, you can ask the engineers if we can put crumb rubber into any of the “Sitework Division” activities. The eight relevant Divisions are:

Division 2 Sitework, including paving and surfacing

Division 3 Concrete

Division 4 Masonry

Division 5 Metals

Division 6 Wood and Plastics

Division 7 Insulation, Siding and Roofing

Division 8 Doors and Windows

Division 9 Finishes and Paints

The design period is the crucial point to include recycled-content products:

• Incorporate them into the design review, at least by the 75% or 95% phase when they start to specify specific products for construction.

• Identify the types of materials used and their recycled-content substitutes.

• Create a list of suppliers or manufacturers of recycled-content products.

• Document percentages of recycled content and highlight interesting design approaches.

• Analyze recycled-content (percentage of post-consumer and post-industrial waste?), recyclability (can it be recycled when it is deconstructed?), durability (extended life?), air emissions (will there be less dangerous off-gassing?), and product performance (will it work just as well or better, be more fire retardant, etc. than non-recycled?).

LEED Standards

Use LEED (Leadership in Energy and in Environmental Design) Standards, which go beyond the State Building Code Title 24 (even though the State requirements were recently increased to aid energy conservation).

LEED is a proprietary rating system developed by the US Green Building Council (see www.usgbc.org). The rating system is a voluntary approach that uates performance from a whole building perspective. You can get silver, gold or platinum certification.

The system is organized into five environmental categories. The Materials and Resources Category covers the area of solid waste, recycling, and use of RCPs. In this category there are seven credits, one prerequisite, and thirteen points available. A minimum of 25% recycled-content material in your building will earn a point. An additional 25% recycled material, will get another point. It does require use of a spreadsheet to calculate total costs of the project.

Resources

Municipal leaders in green building design strategies include Austin, Texas, which started way back in the 1980s. Portland requires all municipal buildings to be LEED certified. Others are San Jose, Oakland, Ventura, San Diego, Los Angeles, Denver, Seattle, New York, Santa Monica, Santa Barbara, and San Francisco.

  • CIWMB — excellent website on green building products: www.ciwmb.ca.gov/GreenBuilding/
  • Center of Excellence for Sustainable Development (CESD). www.sustainable.doe.gov/
  • The Environmental Building News Product Directory: www.greenspec.com
  • Construction materials manufacturers and products directory (but not necessarily recycled content): www.4specs.com
  • Environmental Building News does a very good objective review of products: www.BuildingGreen.com

Training opportunities:

  • National Institute of Building Sciences, Sustainable Buildings Conference: www.nibs.org
  • Architects/Designers/Planners for Social Responsibility, Annual Green Material Showcase: www.Adpsr-norcal.org/adpsr/
  • Alameda County Green Building Seminars: www.StopWaste.org
  • National Association of Home Builders Research Center, National Green Building Conference: www.nahbrc.org/tertiary.asp?TrackID=&CategoryID=1&DocumentID=2984

For more information:

Subscribe to our bi-monthly E-Flash electronic newsletter on LA sustainable development efforts by contacting Lupe Vela (213) 473-7896 or Wendy Johnson (213) 473-8230 at the City of Los Angeles AB 939 Sustainability Partnership, email: [email protected] or www.lacity.org/san/LASP

Resources for Buying Recycled Products: Jim Stewart, Associate Director, SCCED.

I have prepared selected lists of buy-recycled websites, email listserves, and other resources, including phone numbers of some vendors not available via the Internet. Please see the Appendix to this report.

I want to highlight the reference in “Other Buy Recycled Resources” to the Environmental Defense chart from MERGE’s Environmental Guidance Center comparing energy consumption of virgin and recycled packaging materials. The energy consumption to process recycled PET plastic bottles is only 10% of that need to manufacture virgin PET bottles. For HDPE, it is an 87% savings. Thus, the higher the recycled content in the bottle, the greater the energy savings.

The University of California at Berkeley study on “The Economic Impact Of Waste Disposal And Diversion In California,” has some impressive data on the economic benefits when a ton of material is recycled rather than disposed in a landfill.

  • Total sales impacts (rise from $119/ton in the landfill to $254/ton if recycled)
  • Output impacts (from $289/ton to $564/ton)
  • Total income impacts (from $108/ton to $209/ton)
  • Value-added impacts (from $144/ton to $290/ton)
  • Jobs impact (from 2.46 jobs/1000 tons to 4.73 jobs/1000 tons).

CIWMB also has some helpful fact sheets:

  • Steps to Implement a Successful Buy Recycled Program
  • State Agencies Give Re-Refined Oil the Green Light
  • Have You Gotten Recharged Lately?
  • Manufacturer Identification of Recycled Content

Other Workshop Presentations

Purchase Recycled-Content Products — It’s a Good Thing: JoAnn Jaschke, State Agency Buy Recycled Campaign (SABRC), CIWMB, (916) 341-6477.

Buy recycled is the missing arrow in the usual recycling symbol with the three arrows: reduce, reuse, recycle. Buying recycled-content products (RCPs) complements AB 939 and AB 75, which require the diversion of waste from landfills, by ensuring there is a market for the recyclables that are collected.

Federal and State Mandates:

  • California Public Contract Code (PCC) 12210(a) mandates that all local and State public agencies shall buy recycled instead of non-recycled, if price, quality and availability are equal.
  • PCC 12205, 12213 state that “agencies shall require all contractors to certify in writing the minimum percentage, if not the exact percentage, of post-consumer and secondary material in the materials, goods, or services provided or used.” No recycled product shall be discriminated against for any reason other than function. Also you cannot specify in a contract a requirement that would eliminate recycled products, such as a brightness in paper that cannot be provided in recycled-content paper.
  • Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Section 6002 and Executive Order 13101 on “Greening the Government Through Waste Prevention, Recycling, and Federal Acquisition” require that Federal, State and local agencies, and their contractors, are required to buy designated recycled products if they spend more than $10,000 annually on a product and it is partly funded from Federal money.

Definitions:

Total recycled-content percentage is the sum of post-consumer content percentage plus secondary recycled content percentage.

Post-consumer content is material from products purchased, used, and then recycled by a consumer.

Secondary recycled content includes fragments of finished products or finished products that have not reached the consumer, such as a manufacturer’s paper trimmings put back into the manufacturing process for a new product.

State Agency Requirements (SABRC) (To download a copy of the Manual, go to: www.ciwmb.ca.gov/buyrecycled/stateagency/Manual/ These requirements must be met by state agencies, but can be used voluntarily by local governments.):

1. Certify

State agencies shall require all contractors to certify in writing the minimum percentage if not the exact percentage of post-consumer and secondary material in ALL the materials, goods, or services provided or used. Certification Form #74 can be downloaded from: www.ciwmb.ca.gov/Contracts/Forms/CIWMB74.pdf

This form is not required if the information is obtained in writing in a letter, e-mail, product label, catalog, website, purchase order, invoice, contract specification, or product specification.

2. Buy

Buy recycled-content products. To be considered a recycled-content product the products falling into 11 product categories have to contain a certain amount of recycled-content material. Product Categories that must have recycled-content include: copier paper, printing and writing paper, plastic, compost, glass, lubricating oil, paint, solvents, tires, steel, and tire-derived products (such as floor mats, road surfacing, bumpers, etc.). See detailed list of products at: www.ciwmb.ca.gov/buyrecycled/stateagency/Manual/ProdCats.htm

Goal is a minimum of 50% of dollars is spent on recycled-content products for purchases in the specified categories (except 25% for printing and writing paper).

Note that remanufactured, reused or refurbished products are always considered recycled products, regardless of whether or not they meet the minimum content requirements. Be sure and check the DGS Surplus Property Program and CIWMB CalMAX Program before you make purchases.

3. Track

Track purchases when they are made, which can be done manually (on a worksheet CIWMB can provide), or with an Excel spreadsheet or Access database, automatically on your comprehensive purchasing computer system. (Contact CIWMB — JoAnn Jaschke to get Excel reporting programs, which are available from various state agencies.) Remember to include all reportable purchases, both RCPs and non-RCPs, and remember that used or refurbished products are always classified as RCPs.

4. Report

Report on Form #71 — SABRC Procurement Report, which is due 9/1/02 for State agencies, along with copies of the recycled-content certification forms and/or other documentation for each product that contains any amount of recycled material. (The form is available as part of the Manual). The report needs to capture the dollars spent on both non-recycled content products and recycled-content products that fall within the 11 product categories.

Places to find RCPs instead of non-RCPs:

  • RCP Databases: www.ciwmb.ca.gov/RCP , www.epa.gov/cpg , www.ciwmb.ca.gov/GreenBuilding
  • Current suppliers: ask your current suppliers if they have RCPs
  • DGS master contracts for RCPs: http://www.pd.dgs.ca.gov/acqui/reccont.pdf
  • Network: ask your colleagues and other purchasing agents
  • Recycled Product Trade Shows: attend trade shows and talk to suppliers, www.ciwmb.ca.gov/buyrecycled/events/tradeshow
  • Prison Industry Authority (PIA) certifies the recycled-content of its products (which are available for sale to State and local public agencies): http://www.pia.ca.gov/onlinecat/recycle/recycle-static.html
  • Reused or refurbished products:
    • DGS’s Surplus Property Program: www.pd.dgs.ca.gov/default.asp?mp=/materials/surplus.asp
    • CIWMB’s CalMAX Program: www.ciwmb.ca.gov/calmax

Other helpful websites:

– www.ciwmb.ca.gov/buyrecycled/stateagency

– California Multiple Award Schedule (CMAS) master contracts (not necessarily RCPs: www.pd.dgs.ca.gov/default.asp?mp=/acqui/cmas.asp

Guidelines for implementing a successful buy recycled program

  • Track all purchases.
  • Obtain upper management support.
  • Adopt a policy – samples are found on SABRC’s website at: www.ciwmb.ca.gov/BuyRecycled/Policies/
  • Develop a Buy Recycled Team — that includes all branches or divisions.
  • Share information, network about applications, products and suppliers.
  • Ensure there are adequate personnel resources.
  • Evaluate your program annually to ensure you are meeting your goals.
  • Contact CIWMB for assistance:

Jerry Hart (916) 341-6473 or [email protected]

JoAnn Jaschke (916) 341-6477 or [email protected]

Judy Burns (916) 341-6479 or [email protected]

Kathy Marsh (916) 341-6482 or [email protected]

Kimya Lambert (916) 341-6483 or [email protected]

Mary Farr (916) 341-6481 or [email protected]

Patricia Romine (916) 341-6486 or [email protected]

Rick Hicks (916) 341-6480 or [email protected]

Reasons for buying recycled:

  • Reduces waste going to landfills.
  • Conserves natural resources and energy.
  • Supports economic development related to recycled content products.
  • Creates jobs — for every 1000 tons of waste diverted from a landfill, 4.2 new jobs are created.
  • Environmental stewardship.
  • Closes the loop.

Questions:

Q: If, to meet the 50% requirement, we have to pay more, is that ok?

A: Yes, but we can help you find vendors that offer recycled-content products at good prices to help you meet that requirement.

Q: What happens if a State agency doesn’t meet the requirements?

A: Information is included in a report to the Legislature, you will get a letter, and the data is posted on CIWMB website.

The State of California Property Reuse Program: Ed McKendry, California Department of General Services (DGS) Procurement Division, Property Reuse Section (714) 449-5891.

What do large business organizations do with items they no longer need in their operations? Most people probably never give the question a thought.

The State of California’s vast operations certainly make up a very “large organization.” And, every year, many state-run operations have items they no longer need ¾ items that the state designates as surplus property. There are desks, chairs, filing cabinets, bookcases, computers and computer peripheral equipment, copiers, calculators and typewriters. There are also refrigerators and other kitchen equipment as well as cooking utensils and flatware. There is hospital equipment, medical equipment and exercise equipment. There are generators, shop tools and machinery. And there is rolling stock, such as automobiles, trucks and forklifts. Actually, there is a wide selection of many different kinds of items. There are even bicycles that usually come from local police departments.

What happens to these surplus items? Because of their condition, some items have no further useful life. In those instances, the state disposes of them through contracts with recyclers. Many of the other surplus items, however, still have useful life remaining. So, the State of California makes them available for sale to state and local government agencies, school districts, non-profit organizations and the general public ¾ all for literally pennies on the dollar when compared to the original cost of the items when they were new.

The beauty of the state’s program is that it extends the useful life of surplus property that could otherwise end up as landfill. And the program affords those interested in acquiring surplus property the opportunity to save money on items they can use, either for their business operations or for their personal needs.

Dan McDonough, manager of the Surplus Property Program, which is part of the Department of General Services’ Procurement Division, says, “Making the state’s surplus property available to start-up small businesses is an especially helpful way for them to acquire useful items at the lowest possible cost.”

He also emphasizes, “Of course, making the property available to any organization or individual that can use it is what we are all about. It certainly addresses the problem of reducing landfill. More importantly, it ensures that the citizens of California have access to perfectly good items for their individual business or personal needs. And the income that we derive from the sale of the surplus property goes back to California.”

According to McDonough, recently his organization has moved away from calling the program the “Surplus Property Program” to the “Property Reuse Program. ” McDonough says, “Calling ourselves The Property Reuse Program emphasizes our primary responsibility, which is to ensure that all reusable state surplus property is made available to those who are interested in acquiring it.”

The Procurement Division’s Property Reuse Program also serves as the state’s resource for federal surplus property, which is available for donation to state and local government agencies, school districts and non-profit organizations under specific requirements established by the Federal General Services Administration. The property includes a wide variety of items, ranging from such items as commercial refrigeration units to large generators, machine shop equipment, large trucks and vans, cameras and lenses, clothing items and much more. According to Dan McDonough, many of the items are new or nearly new.

In order for an organization to be eligible to acquire federal surplus property, the Procurement Division’s responsible Property Reuse Program personnel must designate the organization as a “Qualified Recipient” through the qualification requirements established by the General Services Administration.

Federal surplus property is also available to certain small business firms that the Federal Small Business Administration designates as eligible to receive the property.

As the incentive for the Procurement Division Property Reuse Program’s making federal surplus property available to qualified organizations and small businesses, the General Services Organization permits the Property Reuse Program to charge the recipients of the donated property a nominal service and handling fee. As Dan McDonough is quick to point out, the service and handling fee represents a very small figure when compared to the actual value of the donated property.

Another important feature of the federal program is the ability of a Qualified Recipient to request the Procurement Division’s Property Reuse unit to locate and acquire specific items on their behalf. For a nominal service and handling fee, the Property Reuse unit’s Property Screeners will find the items and arrange for their delivery directly to the Qualified Recipient.

As a condition of receiving donated federal property, including rolling stock, valued in excess of $5,000, all Qualified Recipients must provide assurance that the property will be placed in use for its intended purpose within 18 months after its receipt. Qualified Recipients must place all other donated property in use within 12 months after its receipt. The Procurement Division’s Property Reuse Program unit is responsible for assuring that the Qualified Recipient has carried out this condition of use.

From time to time, the General Services Administration may authorize the Procurement Division’s Property Reuse unit to make this highly desirable federal surplus property available to the general public in a silent auction. This is another important way for any organization or individual to acquire items at significant savings.

The State of California has two locations where surplus property is available for sale:

Fullerton

Property Reuse Program, 701 Burning Tree Road, Fullerton, California 92833

(714) 449-5900 (FAX) (714) 449-5917 TTY/TDD (714) 733-2093

Sacramento

Property Reuse Program, 1700W National Drive, Sacramento, California 95834

(916) 928-4630 (FAX) (916) 928-0304 TTY/TDD (916) 928-4735

Selected state surplus property is also available through online auctions. To view the property, go to www.dgs.ca.gov, which will take you to the Department of General Services home page. Once there, double click on SURPLUS PROPERTY and follow the link to BID ON THESE ITEMS.

Clearly, the State of California’ Property Reuse Program provides a tremendous opportunity for organizations and individuals throughout the state to save money while providing for their business and personal needs. Dan McDonough and his staff in Fullerton and Sacramento are ready to help anyone who is interested in taking advantage of this outstanding program.

Getting to 50%

Los Angeles, California, June 10, 1998
Organized by the Southern California Council on Environment and Development
Summary Notes by Jim Stewart

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Presentation by the CIWMB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Update: Analyzing Your Base Year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Source Reduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Organics Recycling. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 
Innovative Funding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Procurement & Market Dev’t for Recycled Materials . . 17
Variable Can Rates. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
C&D; Recycling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Multi-Family Residential Recycling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Commercial Sector Recycling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Conference Feedback. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
Waste Prevention Info Exchange Contacts . . . . . . . . . . . 30

Acknowledgements

Grateful appreciation to the following people who put in many hours for the planning and implementing of this conference: Carmen Carso, Joe Haworth, Michael Huls, John Jakupcak, Mike Miller, and Joan Satt. And a special thank you to the sponsors of the conference: Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts, GTE California, Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, and the Hewlett Foundation.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Over a hundred waste management professionals attended “Getting to 50%,” a conference produced by the Southern California Council on Environment and Development (SCCED, pronounced “succeed”). SCCED works toward building a sustainable future for Southern California by bringing together people from government agencies, environmental and community groups, universities, and businesses in the Greater Los Angeles Area. In facilitated task forces, forums, and conferences, SCCED works to build consensus on programs and policies to protect the environment, strengthen the economy, and ensure equity for the region’s 15 million residents.

The conference took place at the L.A. County Department of Public Works. It featured numerous presentations on programs to help cities reach the state mandate of 50% waste diversion by 2000.

Keynote speaker, Keith Smith, CIWMB Deputy Director, announced that the statewide diversion rate increased from 17% in 1990 to 32% in 1997. As early as 1995, 15% of jurisdictions reported over 50% diversion, with 60% between 25-50%; 25% fell below 25% diversion. He stressed CIWMB wants every jurisdiction to make the goal, if not by 2000, then by 2003 or 2005 at the latest. He urged agencies to focus on the biggest sources left, organics and construction and demolition (C&D;). Together these comprise about 40% of the remaining waste stream.

Judith Freedman, also from CIWMB, outlined ways to deal with low diversion percentages, such as adjusting the base year. Then Susan Collins, a consultant, mentioned there are actually 45 options for adjusting the base year.

Consultant Eugene Tseng described how audits of 95 companies in Carson yielded a 77.6% diversion rate from those companies. This diversion was previously not included in the municipal waste report. Jamie Herbon, from the City of Fountain Valley, described methods for public education and waste prevention. Gail Kaufman reported how the City of Thousand Oaks has made it illegal to deliver unwanted newspapers and handbills to any home that requests no junk mail and flyers.

Doug Walters, Mike Miller, David Hardy, and Roger Van der Wende presented solutions for recycling organics, including transforming “zoo doo” into the popular fertilizer “TOPGRO.” The panel on innovative funding, including Mike Mohajer of L.A. County Public Works, Constance Hornig, esq. and consultant Nancy Hicks shared diversion cost savings strategies and ways to raise fees without violating Prop 218.

Jim Mang from Long Beach overviewed using a recycled market development zone to generate markets for recycled materials, while Vince Bonfanti explained how Fort James Paper Company finances MRFs and recycling operations to feed their mills.

Several speakers, including Mark Harmon, Joe Delaney, and Mike Silva presented approaches to develop and market variable can rates. Kelly Ingalls and his colleague Danielle Britton told how the City of Los Angeles works with architects and contractors to recycle up to 98.5% of a demolished office building. John Agamalian provided tips on creating a recycling plan for a construction project.

David Little, Chip Clements, and Tim McNamara described the challenges of multi-family residential recycling and overcoming them by skillful work with building managers. In another panel on commercial sector recycling, Jaime Lozano reported how Carson worked with students to complete waste audits of 95 large businesses for a cost of only $10,000 paid for by their franchise hauler. Karen Higgins described the technical support Los Angeles provides business, while Joe Sloan of Consolidated Services Company outlined the challenges for small businesses.

PRESENTATION BY THE CIWMB

Keith Smith, Deputy Director of CIWMB: The focus of the Board is to work with cities and counties to achieve the 50% diversion goal. The chart shows statewide diversion has increased from 17% in 1990 to 32% in 1997. In 1995, 15% of jurisdictions were already over 50% diversion, 60% between 25-50%, and 25% below 25% diversion.

The estimated pounds disposed per resident per day (40% of the waste stream), has declined 40%, from 3.1 in 1990, to 2.4 in 1997. However, non-residential waste (40% of the waste stream) has only declined 20%, from 9.7 pounds per employee in 1990 to 7.9 in 1997.

Judith Freedman, CIWMB

Some reasons for low diversion percentages and how to deal with them include:

1. Lack of implementation of programs to reduce waste sent to landfills.

2. Base-year problems, such as missed non-franchised hauler disposal.

3. Adjustment method problems, such as not correcting for large C&D; projects or large changes in the industrial sector. (You can choose from county-level or jurisdiction -specific factors for population, taxable sales and employment; use the statewide or regional CPI; or adopt factors published by an independent third-party source.)

4. Systemic reporting problems, such as drivers not telling the specific jurisdiction of origin of the waste, or not taking allowable deductions for disasters, treated regional medical waste residue, regional diversion facility residue or exported waste that is diverted later.

Our role is to work with you; any compliance enforcement is a last resort. Good faith efforts are all reasonable, feasible efforts to implement the progress and achieve the results.

SB1066 has provided for an extension up to January 1, 2006. You must submit a request and all documentation by July 1, 1998.

Compliance process:

1. CIWMB’s biennial review will initiate the compliance process.

2. CIWMB will provide targeted assistance to maximize diversion program implementation.

3. After a public hearing the Board may impose a compliance order and schedule.

4. The compliance order and schedule will be developed with the jurisdiction on a case by case basis.

5. If the compliance order and schedule are met, then there will be no fine; if the compliance order and schedule are not met, then the Board may impose a fine.

Smith: Our goal is for every agency to make it; the flexibilities will help you. We are focusing on the biggest sources left, comprising 40% of the remaining waste stream:

1. Increasing organic material diversion (now about 30% of the waste stream): We are encouraging yard and food waste recycling, source reduction, grass recycling, increasing composting, making it easier to get into the compost business, improving the quality of the product and how to get it into the marketplace, increasing demand, improving feedstock quality, decreasing institutional food waste and dealing with it on site, and helping supermarkets to not over order.

2. Increasing C&D; debris recycling on and off site (now about 25% of the waste stream): We are: seeking two big jurisdictions to establish partnerships to set up a system for source reduction and re-use; looking at obstacles to reuse of C&D; material; working with the architects and engineering boards to encourage use of recycled products; partnering with Home Depot to display more recycled products.

3. Improving facility compliance: We are bringing unlicensed facilities into being licensed, looking at chronic violations, bringing old permits up to date, bringing together local enforcement agencies and recycling coordinators.

4. Improving local government performance: We will publicize those at 50% and put your ideas on our website. We want to help make it easy to do the programs, get our employees into the field and create the local and statewide partnerships. Then, where municipalities have refused to act, we may have to do enforcement.

We encourage you to achieve 50% as soon as possible, but some of you may have go to 2003 or 2005. Use the four Ps:

  • Perspective: be clear on what waste is left out there.
  • Partnerships: form cross-functional relationships with businesses and other governments.
  • Priorities: work on the biggest sources.
  • Persistence: keep at it.

We have just started policy development to answer what happens after 2000 when we get to 50%.

Discussion:

Question: Some municipalities are spending a lot of money and others not; it would be helpful to go after the slackers.

Smith: Watch what we do.

Question: Why does California have fines, when other states don’t?

Smith: It is part of the legislation, but incentives are helpful.

Question: Wouldn’t it help to give more credit to non-burn technology that recycles rather than incinerates? What about giving credit to municipalities that purchase recycled goods?

Smith: Good points. We’ll look at that.

Question: You need to deal with the suppliers of the packaging that has a lot of waste.

Smith: Source reduction is the big target, especially in the industrial sector. We are looking at ISO 14000. Now the plastics industry is feeling the heat. We are looking at the waste management policy for 21st century. What are the policy options we should look at? Let us know what your concerns would be.

Question: What does a good faith effort mean?

Freedman: It means making reasonable and feasible efforts to achieve the mandate.

Smith: If you have plans that have been certified, but you haven’t implemented them, then you may be in trouble. Out of 531 agencies reviewed, so far only 4 have been found out of compliance with a schedule.

UPDATE: Analyzing Your Base Year

Susan Collins Hilton, Farnkopf, and Hobson, consultant

The basic formula is to take your 1990 waste generation, adjust it to create a projected year 2000 total, and multiply by 50% to get your allowable disposal amount in 2000. There are many adjustment factors, such as changes in population, taxable sales and employment. Use the most favorable adjustment factors. You can mix and match and use the city or county factors that work best for you.

Four approaches to correct a data problem:

1. Adjust the base year.

2. Adjust the reporting year.

3. Start over, create a new base year now.

4. Submit annual generation-based analysis.

Always provide sufficient documentation for whatever options you choose. The Board studied 45 options for adjusting the base year and found several acceptable. Improve your data, such as examine current records, identify all haulers, look at self-haul and non-franchise haulers (especially for C&D;). It is very valuable to contact all landfills and get accurate records for your municipality. Do re-examine your base year diversion, e.g. what recycling was already happening in 1990. Use allowable corrections, although, medical waste, regional diversion, etc. are usually so small, less than 0.1%, that they are negligible for most jurisdictions. However, sewage sludge calculations could be useful.

Talk to your CIWMB representative about possible corrections to your base year. For anyone in Los Angeles County, in 1990, there was a countywide lack of allocation. Jurisdictions reported a total of 10.5 million tons, but the amount received at landfills was 15.9 million, so that 5.4 million or 34% was unallocated. This problem is still not solved in Los Angeles County.

When I worked with Pasadena, we found a diversion of negative 83% without adjustment, but got a positive 36% diversion after adjustment. The problem: they surveyed only one landfill, and had to look at others to get the complete picture.

In the case of Long Beach, without adjustment they reported 7% diversion, but after adjustment of base year got 24% in 1995 and 29% in 1996. The problem: 200 haulers took waste to 15 sites in 4 counties and not all of these were counted in 1990. There is a recycling market development zone (RMDZ) in Long Beach, but it has little significant impact on the numbers.

SB1066 created an extension of the 50% deadline beyond January 1, 2000. You can get a single or multi-year extension not to exceed a total of 5 years. The bill sunsets in 2006. The bill also requires market development for recyclables by the CIWMB. The extensions are based on substantial evidence in your annual reports to implement source reduction, etc. You need to identify what alternatives produce the greatest achievable diversion. The Board will consider waste disposal patterns, types of waste, and additional information such as funding problems, when considering whethe

Resolution Relating to Sustainable Communities

Passed by the League of California Cities
October 19, 1993

WHEREAS, it is recognized that we live in a period of great environmental crisis; and

WHEREAS, we need to create the basis for a more sustainable way of life, both in California and globally, through wise stewardship of our natural environment and prevention of harm to human health; and

WHEREAS, our impact on the natural environment must not jeopardize the prospects of future generations, balanced with the needs of economic growth; and

WHEREAS, environmental quality and economic health are mutually dependent, and a healthy environment cannot be achieved if inequitable burdens are placed on any one ethnic, geographic. or economic sector of the population; and

WHEREAS, policies and programs must recognize the inter-connections between different environmental problems, and solutions should be based on an uation of true long-term costs and benefits, not just those of the current market; and

WHEREAS, communities must somehow learn to achieve the markets that promote both conservation and economic growth; and

WHEREAS, our society and economy cannot be sustained at our current level of national resource consumption and environmental pollution; now, therefore, be it

RESOLVED, by the General Assembly of the League of California Cities assembled in Annual Conference in San Francisco, October 19, 1993, that the League encourage the following:

  1. Creation of Sustainable Community programs in California cities through the participation of all segments of the respective communities,
  2. Regional efforts to adopt policies and programs based on the concept of sustainability to ensure the future well-being of our natural and human resources, and
  3. Participation of California cities in new forums/organizations to promote and implement sustainable policies.

Hot tub

The 35 foot long pool has a hot tub, and is surrounded by a 55 foot long deck with spectacular mountain views. The environment includes palm, pine, and fruit trees, flowers, and two dozen white peace doves.

BUILDING SUSTAINABLE CITIES

Thursday, May 11, 2000, Santa Monica, California

Summary Notes by Jim Stewart

Sponsored by the City of Santa Monica and the Southern California Council on Environment and Development with additional support from the South Coast Air Quality Management District and Southern California Gas Company

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Becoming a Sustainable City

Dean Kubani, Senior Environment Policy Analyst and Director of Santa Monica’s Sustainable City Program, 310-458-2227:

The Sustainable City Program involves the community in developing a comprehensive vision, including environment, housing and economics. Our accomplishments include a 5% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, 92% reduction in urban runoff, and more.

Eugene Zeller, Director of Planning and Building Department, City of Long Beach, 562-570-6428:

We will establish baseline data and benchmarks as part of a community scorecard. We will develop “green” building guidelines for purchase of materials and maintenance of city facilities. We will also revise our land use plan to allow for appropriate densities and development.

Douglas Otto, Facilitator for the Long Beach Strategic Plan and member of the Planning Commission, 562-491-1191:

We saw sustainability as a metaphor for the entire Strategic Plan. Ultimately the residents must buy into the process, through development of community indicators and long term involvement in the process.

Energy Efficiency, Renewables and Deregulation

Craig Perkins, City of Santa Monica, 310-458-8221:

Our program involves energy efficiency projects (lighting, etc.), renewable energy procurement (we are now 100% green power for all city facilities), local energy sources (photovoltaic carport, solar electric roofing, etc.) and new efficient HVAC systems.

John Moot, City Council, City of Chula Vista, 619-233-1888:

Energy deregulation is a big opportunity for us to make a statement to the marketplace that there is a demand for clean energy. Users of 50 kW or less per meter are eligible for a subsidy of 1.25¢ per kWh, so we got it for less than the cost of dirty brown energy.

Environmentally Preferable Purchasing

Manuel Jaquez, Purchasing Specifications Analyst, General Services Department, City of Los Angeles, 213-847-1434:

There are many benefits in sustainable products procurement that can help protect the environment, human life, and natural resources, as well as reduce product cost and provide revenue savings to public agencies.

Dean Kubani, City of Santa Monica, 310-458-2227:

The US EPA did a report of “green” purchasing in Santa Monica, available from us, or the EPA. We decided to define green purchasing as “environmentally preferable purchasing,” including products that are recycled, less hazardous (less toxic), resource efficient and less polluting (such as alternative fueled vehicles).

Alternative Fuel Vehicle Fleets

Rick Cole, City Manager, City of Azusa, 626-797-4757:

We have used AB 2766 funds to purchase five CNG trucks. We are working with the Gas Company to install a fast CNG fueling facility for our area of the San Gabriel Valley. Even if you have limited finances, you can still do it.

T. L. Garrett, Air Quality Division, Environmental Affairs Department, City of Los Angeles, 213-580-1025

Clean fuels funding can come from the Carl Moyer program, MSRC, heavy-duty diesel retrofit program, AB 2766, State energy program grants, etc. Our next steps include: identifying alternative fuel niche applications and infrastructure development.

Green Building and Design

Susan Munves, Resource Efficiency Coordinator, City of Santa Monica, 310-458-8229:

Good green buildings often cost little or no more to build than inefficient ones. We have developed guidelines that will apply to all new construction and substantial remodels of commercial and multi-family buildings.

George Burmeister, Colorado Energy Group (consultant to Santa Clarita), 303-494-4711:

The Community Energy Efficiency Program is a utility-sponsored voluntary program, which encourages incentives from local governments to homebuilders to build at least 30% beyond code requirements for efficiency. The results are big savings in utility bills for homeowners.

Cities for Climate Protection Campaign

Pam O’Connor, Santa Monica City Council, 310-458-8201:

The International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) brings together municipal policy and technical people to support improvements in our cities. It creates a network for sharing information and makes it fun and interesting.

Abby Young, USA Director, ICLEI, 510-540-8843:

The Cities for Climate Protection campaign began in 1993 to see how cities could readily achieve global warming reductions. It doesn’t cost anything to participate. We have software programs, materials and training workshops.

Dean Kubani, City of Santa Monica, 310-458-2227:

We have been impressed with the ICLEI information. We recommend participation.

Field Visits to Santa Monica’s Facilities

Pico Boulevard Streetscape Project: Craig Perkins, Director, Environmental and Public Works Department, 310-458-8221:

We are enhancing the safety and appearance of Pico Boulevard by a median strip with trees, accent street lights, additional street streets and crosswalk enhancements.

Alternative Fuel Vehicles: Joe Delaney, Solid Waste Operations Manager, 310-458-8554:

We have 70% of the City’s Solid Waste vehicles on alternative fuels, including cars, trash trucks, street sweepers, shovel loaders, etc. We have both fast and slow fill CNG facilities.

Green Fleets: Ralph Merced, Fleet Maintenance Supervisor, Department of Environmental and Public Works Management:

Recycled/environmentally preferable products we use include: re-refined oil and hydraulic fluid, recycled oil filters, re-conditioned batteries, retread tires, propylene glycol anti-freeze, water-based parts cleaner, etc.

Green Street Repair: Bogee Cline, Street Maintenance Superintendent:

We use cooler “white topping,” a cement-asbestos mixture that goes over the old asphalt base. We are using brick pavers instead of concrete for sidewalks to save a lot of labor. We are testing rubberized sidewalks that are great for kids to play on because they are soft.

Green Cleaning Products and Equipment on the Third Street Promenade: Craig Perkins and Eddie Greenberg, Promenade Crew Leader, Solid Waste Management Department:

We use small electric utility trucks for maintenance. We use less toxic cleaning products to protect our employees’ health. The result has been improved custodial morale, as well as lower costs, with no reduction in effective cleaning.

Santa Monica Urban Runoff Recycling Facility (SMURRF): Craig Perkins and Neal Shapiro, Urban Runoff Coordinator:

The SMURRF treats up to 0.5 million gallons per day of urban runoff. Before this facility, these drains sent untreated water directly into the Santa Monica Bay full of litter, decaying leaves, oil, pesticides and bacteria, threatening the health of swimmers and fish.

SUMMARIES OF PRESENTATIONS

For more information, contact the speaker.

Welcome and Overview

Kathleen Gildred, Director, SCCED, 310-281-8534: Agenda 21 was adopted by all the nations of the Earth at the Earth Summit in 1992 as the environmental agenda for the 21st Century. Chapter 27 points out that the cities are key to implementation of that agenda. That is a basis for this conference.

Terrence McNally, Moderator, 310-312-0041: Today we are going to discuss the principles of sustainability, and we will find that going “green” is not necessarily more expensive or less effective. In fact, if we consider a longer time frame and externalities, it is the most responsible way to go.

Becoming a Sustainable City

Craig Perkins, Director, Environmental and Public Works Department, City of Santa Monica, 310-458-8221:

We are adopting a systemic approach to sustainability. For example, currently, recycling programs lose money, yet if we make responsible purchasing decisions to buy recycled paper, then we are using a systems approach to increase the value of our recyclables. If we recognize our collective roles in creating solutions nationally and locally, we see that municipalities have a lot of ability to make change.

Today is a good opportunity to learn from each other and overcome the compartmentalization of our separate jurisdictional boundaries to get to regional and national solutions.

Dean Kubani, Senior Environment Policy Analyst and Director of Santa Monica’s Sustainable City Program, 310-458-2227:

Santa Monica has 92,000 people in 8.3 square miles, with no vacant land, so development is infill and remodels.

In the early 1990s we started a comprehensive process of examining our environmental programs because they were being implemented in a piecemeal way. The Sustainable City Program allowed us to pull the programs together and involve the community in developing a vision of where it wanted to be in 30 years. We integrated the environment, housing and economics.

We formed a task force and held a lot of public meetings in addition to surveys. The Sustainable City Program was adopted by the City Council in September 1994. It has eight Guiding Principles that provide a broader vision, plus Policy Area Goals for:

  • Resource Conservation, including energy and water use
  • Transportation
  • Pollution Prevention and Public Health
  • Community and Economic Development, including housing, open space and parks

We developed sixteen original indicators that:

  • Were numerical and measurable
  • Tied to the principles and major goals
  • Could be influenced by local community or government actions
  • Established targets for 2000 (which were based on existing mandated goals, informal policies, or our best guess).

Our implementation strategies included: ordinances, general plan, development agreements, internal administrative polices, as well as education of our staff and the community.

Our funding strategies included: reallocating existing resources, establishing partnerships with public and private agencies, taxing unsustainable practices, property assessments, operational savings and grants from Metropolitan Water District (MWD), California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB), California Department of Pesticide Regulations (DPR), and others.

Our accomplishments include:

Greenhouse Gas Emissions 5% reduction

Water Use 13% reduction

Wastewater Flows 13% reduction

Urban Runoff 92% reduction

Landfilled Solid Waste 36% reduction

Fleet Vehicles using alternative fuel 40% of fleet

Bus Ridership 9.5% increase

Public Open Space 10% increase

Public Trees 3% increase

Affordable Housing Units 40% increase

Please see our website for more information:

http://pen.ci.santa-monica.ca.us/environment/policy

Eugene Zeller, Director of Planning and Building Department, City of Long Beach, 562-570-6428:

Long Beach has developed a strategic plan for development of the city for the next decade. Using a public survey, we identified seven key strategies, one of which was related to the environment. We established an Environment Task Force, which identified sustainability as the overarching goal and the precept by which future actions will be judged.

Our goal is to create a sustainable city. This will involve coordinating relevant activities of all departments. We will create a Sustainable Development Board to establish baseline data, look at full cost accounting, uate our purchasing policies, identify incentives, and encourage public education awareness and involvement.

We hope the Strategic Plan will be adopted by City Council in July. Thereafter my department will work with other departments and the Sustainable Development Board to establish baseline data and benchmarks as part of a community scorecard. We will also develop green building guidelines for purchase of materials and maintenance of city facilities and possibly for private developments. We will also:

– Revise our land use plan to allow for appropriate densities

– Encourage pedestrian-oriented mixed-use development

– Focus growth in downtown and along arterials

– Encourage high quality mixed use housing

– Preserve open space

– Develop a comprehensive beach harbor, rivers and wetlands master plan

– Integrate neighborhoods with rivers and the shoreline

– Compile an inventory of restorable wetland areas

– Collaborate with the Federal government and other cities to establish wetlands and bird zones

– Identify funding for land acquisition for habitat

– Enhance the beachfront

– Restore wetlands and create recreational opportunities along the rivers.

Douglas Otto, Facilitator for the Long Beach Strategic Plan and member of the Planning Commission, 562-491-1191:

Long Beach has a magnificent environment, including 5 miles of beaches, terminus for both the Los Angeles and San Gabriel rivers, a beach bike path, 43 varieties of shore birds, stops on the Pacific Flyway, relatively good air quality, etc. The Long Beach Aquarium of the Pacific celebrates our environment awareness.

I was facilitator of the process to allow citizens to participate in the plan. We saw sustainability as a metaphor for the entire Strategic Plan. Ultimately the residents must buy into the process, through development of community indicators and long term involvement in the process.

David Sundstrom, as chair of the environment planning process, involved people with a variety of views, including the environmental community, neighborhood organizations, business, religious groups, etc.

We realized measurable targets are key, because the citizens cry out for ways to assess their government in a quick, effective way.

Questions and Answers

Q: What was the percentage response to your surveys?

AOtto: Long Beach didn’t do a survey. We had many community meetings over 7 months. In a “community scan” in 1997, a group led by a professor interviewed community leaders and residents to identify major issues.

Q: What were your cost savings as compared to the cost of implementation?

APerkins: The Santa Monica toilet retrofit program made a profit. Since 1990 it has cost $1 million to implement and saved $3 million. We are expecting to spend $200,000 for energy conservation measures with a 12 year payback period.

Kubani: Our toxics use reduction program is saving 5% over the old program with no loss of effectiveness. Our integrated pest management (IPM) program is saving 30% over our old pest control contract and completely eliminates spraying of pesticides.

Q: Is the first step getting the politicians on the City Council involved?

AZeller: The environment was one of top issues in the community scan. It was championed by the community who saw environmental consequences as an important part of the decision-making processes. The report will go to City Council in a favorable political climate.

A: Otto: Most governments respond to the “crisis du jour,” so the City Council needs citizen action to bring long range planning to their attention.

Energy Efficiency, Renewables and Deregulation

Craig Perkins, City of Santa Monica, 310-458-8221:

Prior to deregulation, the electricity in our municipal facilities came from Edison, using the “system” mix of natural gas, hydro, coal, and nuclear, with renewables comprising only about 11%. It cost us about $80 million per year.

Our guiding principles for finding a new source of electricity were to:

– Ensure reliability and price stability

– Optimize energy efficiency investments

– Reduce environment and health impact

– Increase use of renewable resources

– Improve the environmental impact of utility restructuring

– Gain greater control of city’s energy future

Electricity generation creates half of all air pollution in the US and over a third of the global warming emissions. The average American is responsible for the annual release of 22 tons of CO2, 5 times the global per capita average.

Our analysis of deregulation showed:

– Potential cost savings are minimal by switching providers (we could save 1-3% using electricity from primarily coal plants)

– City aggregation opportunities are limited

– Energy efficiency and development of community energy systems present the greatest opportunities

– Purchase of green power is the best current approach to achieving our city’s goals

We did a survey of 400 residents and 400 businesses and found:

– Understanding of deregulation and green electricity is low.

– 70% said they would switch to green energy if there was no difference in price.

– If it cost 10% more, 45% of residential customers and 30% of businesses would still want green power.

– The city should play a lead role in educating and informing the community.

We asked for bids and on February 1, 1999, the City Council voted that as of June 1, 1999, we would be purchasing 100% green power from Commonwealth Energy. They pledged to bring on line new geothermal sources for this power. We also began implementation of the following strategies:

1. Energy efficiency

– Retrofit city facilities at a cost of $2 million would produce $200,000 annual savings, providing a 12 year payback. Lighting efficiency has a faster payback.

– Implement new building standards for municipal facilities.

– Develop regional energy efficiency demonstration projects with a focus on opportunities for residents and small businesses, including a pilot project with access to public goods funds to install energy efficiency technology.

– Lower average urban temperature to reduce the need for air conditioning by planting trees, lightening color of pavement, reflective roofs, etc. These methods could drop the average summer temperature by 7-10º.

2. Renewable energy procurement

– Provide information to the community and actively promote switching to green power.

– Advocate for continued state and federal funding support for green power.

– Demonstrate city’s commitment by purchasing green power.

3. Local energy sources

– Install photovoltaics on roofs.

– Implement solar schools program.

– Evaluate innovative integrated approaches, such as combining yard waste disposal with cogeneration of electricity.

– Install photovoltaic carport, solar electric roofing.

4. Community energy systems

– Do a feasibility study of alternative energy for the Civic Center for heating, cooling and electricity.

– Incorporate new systems into the public safety building under construction.

5. City’s role beyond its boundaries

– Advocate on behalf of Santa Monica’s approach with other jurisdictions.

Summary: Energy is a critical part of the new future and municipalities need to set an example. It takes:

– commitment

– creativity

– courage

– conscience

– choice

John Moot, City Council, City of Chula Vista, 619-233-1888:

One of our residents had gotten our city involved in the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) program, so I had an awareness of some of these issues. The San Diego County Association of Governments (SANDAG) decided to form a power pool to purchase energy at lower cost. Commonwealth Energy proposed an energy mix of 80% coal, which would save a little money. But I realized that local government pays for much of the cost of the health care for pollution-related diseases, and the property damage done by global warming.

Energy deregulation is big opportunity for us to make a statement to the marketplace that there is a demand for clean energy. We said we wanted a portion of our $10 million in electric purchases to be from renewable sources. So Commonwealth came back with a green energy option. Because of the Renewable Energy Trust Fund, users of 50 kW or less per meter are eligible for a subsidy of 1.5¢ per kWh, so we got it for less than the cost of brown energy. As a result, 80% of the governments in SANDAG signed up for green energy, and we have replaced polluting sources with clean energy.

San Diego is not liberal, but we presented it as voluntary option that was cheaper, and the newspaper ran supportive articles. We could convince City Councils to start at 50% green and increase it later. Even the ex-marine Mayor of Oceanside saw the benefits and the political capital that could be gained by switching to green energy. The choice benefits both the people and the environment.

Q: What is cost of solar electric roofing?

A: It costs about 3 times the cost of normal metal roofing. You can get it from a California company called Solar Utility.

Q: Do your building permits require more energy efficiency?

A: No, we use incentive programs, because people don’t like punitive rules. We have offered incentives such as break on a permit fee, based on the model of the Austin, Texas Green Star program.

Q; Did you get any funding from the federal government?

APerkins: We got some money to hire a consultant to do the analysis of the bids. It turns out the calculation of electric power is very complicated.

Q: How long did it take to implement the conversion?

APerkins: Because Edison makes it so hard, it took 6 months for Santa Monica to do it.

AMoot: A big issue is the cost of changing the meters. In the future, make sure you own the meters.

Terrence McNally: It is important to remember that you are reducing public health costs by purchasing green energy.

Environmentally Preferable Purchasing

Terrence McNally: Since 20% of spending in the nation is by governmental entities, it is possible for government procurement to drive environmental change.

Manuel Jaquez, Purchasing Specifications Analyst, General Services Department, City of Los Angeles, 213-847-1434:

A. Why switch to environmentally preferable products? It is:

1. Politically correct:

– Fulfills legislative mandates (such as increased diversion from landfills)

– Integrates objectives (increases markets for recycled and sustainable products)

2. Good for the environment:

– Conserves natural resources and raw materials.

– Has long term implications for the global environment and survival of life and humanity.

3. Benefits employee safety and public health and welfare:

– Use product safety and material safety data to ensure employee health.

– Design and uate sustainable products to reduce impacts on health and the environment, without compromising safety standards and product performance and operational specifications.

  1. How do we change purchasing procedures? 
    Purchasing procedures in the City of Los Angeles are complex. The City practices centralized competitive bidding and decentralized buying by operating departments against the awarded contracts through purchase orders, sub-purchase orders, and other mechanisms allowed to departments: petty cash, blanket authority, and credit cards. The bidding process is integrated with development of City standards, operational and performance specifications to meet operational needs by the 40 City Council controlled departments, bureaus, and offices. The City’s other three proprietary departments: Airports, Harbor, and the Water and Power Departments have their own purchasing program. 

    In public procurement the issue of communication is very critical in purchasing the products and materials specified to meet or exceed the operational needs of the end user operations. This communication is equally important in partnering between the City user department, the manufacturer/ vendor, and the purchasing department. 

    In developing effective communications and operations, one needs to consider the following:

1. Develop a strategy to identify operational issues, conduct needs assessments, find strengths and weaknesses, note opportunities and threats.

2. Obtain management support; plan procurement process goals and objectives; obtain the right complement of staffing resources; set timetables for review of end user operational needs; conduct value analysis and product life cycle analysis; and conduct uations of product-operations performance.

3. Analyze political decisions for administrative and operational implementation and networking with the employees involved.

4. Do product–operations life cycle analysis to determine costs and benefits to find the lowest ultimate cost to the city and the community. The cost-benefit analysis is important to calculate the return on investment. This calculation helps one to learn the costs involved in providing safe products, protecting the City liability, and protecting the taxpayer’s interest.

5. Look at short term and long term benefits of the procurement decisions

and remember the waste management hierarchy:

– Reduce

– Reuse

– Recycle

6. Build a sustainable recycling strategy:

– Use closed loop arrangements and consider remanufactured products when practical and where recycled product content is possible.

– Integrate a sustainable strategy through:

– Source reduction and purchasing

– Collection, recycling and reclamation programs

– Solid waste management, landfill diversion and disposal programs

7. Fulfill Federal Energy Star and Sustainable Product Procurement requirements for post-consumer and secondary waste content:.

– As of January 1, 1999, all copy, printing and writing paper is required to have at least 30% post-consumer recycled content for all state or local agency purchases using over $10,000 of federal funds, per Executive Order #13101 (see www.ofee.gov).

C. What are our product categories? The City of Los Angeles currently is re-engineering the procurement process and its purchasing system. The business process and systems will be streamlined and computerized by October 1, 2000. There is a need to maintain a technical engineering team support to the procurement operation. The City has a Recycled Products Purchasing Program where 18 categories of recycled products are identified for City’s purchasing. This Program is complemented with a 10% price preference for recycled products bids. The following are the recycled product categories in that Program:

1. Paper and paper products

2. Compost

3. Glass

4. Lubricating oil

5. Plastics

6. Solvents and paints

7. Tires

8. Building insulation materials

9. Concrete and cement , fly ash

10. Auto parts

11. Rubber

12. Asphalt

13. Batteries

14. Aggregate rock

15. Remanufactured laser toner cartridges

16. Processed crushed miscellaneous base (for road construction)

17. Movable and portable walls (for office enclosures)

18. Antifreeze/coolant

Example: As an example of cost savings and benefits by revising specifications to improve field operations, the City reviewed and revised the way street operations and inert materials relative to asphalt recycling were being handled. At that time, 90% of street resurfacing inert materials was landfilled and 10% was recycled into new asphalt materials used in street paving . The City was paying to dispose it in a landfill and another City operation was buying the same inert materials for base in roadways. By revising the specifications and changing operations, the inert materials were recycled and reused in street paving and maintenance The result was a cost savings of over $1.5 million per year.

D. Conclusion: There are many benefits in sustainable products procurement that can help protect the environment, human life, and natural resources, as well as reduce product cost and provide revenue savings to public agencies.

Dean Kubani, City of Santa Monica, 310-458-2227:

The USEPA did a case study of “green” purchasing in Santa Monica. The full report is available from us, or the EPA. We decided to define green purchasing as “environmentally preferable purchasing.” It is not limited to purchasing recycled products, it also includes products that are less hazardous (less toxic), resource efficient and less polluting (such as alternative fueled vehicles).

Our purchasing goals include:

– Reduce Resource Consumption

– Reduce Waste and Pollution

– Protect Human Health and the Environment

Areas of purchasing success include:

– Environmentally friendly vehicle maintenance products, including antifreeze, parts cleaner, motor oil, retread tires

– Safer custodial supplies

– Recycled content products, including paper, office products, motor oil, street surfacing materials, paint, trash can liners, etc.

– Alternative fuel vehicles

– Integrated pest control services

– Energy and water conserving equipment

– Renewable sources of electricity.

Green purchasing is based on:

– Ordinances

– Council-adopted policies

– Administrative policies (this is our primary implementation strategy, it is not directed or mandated by City Council, but they are supportive of our approach).

Implementation methods can be simple or complex. You can have a single criterion for a single product, or you can have multiple criteria involving multiple products, with a citywide bid process. The Environmental Programs Division staff work within the existing City purchasing process and partner with buyers, upper management and end users. We conduct research, test products, develop specifications, and train end users.

Obstacles we have overcome included:

– “Low bid” – We decided to define that as the “lowest responsible bid,” so it can include environmental attributes and performance criteria as well as cost.

– Employee resistance to change – We provided training and education. We told them we were concerned with their health and they got enthusiastic about the new non-toxic cleaning products.

– Product performance – We did research and testing to find out the products and methods of use that worked best.

Keys to success were:

– Get support from the top

– Include end users in the decision making process

– Do detailed research and testing

– Implement a pilot program first

– Train end users

– Be flexible, and change direction if needed.

Alternative Fuel Vehicle Fleets

Rick Cole, City Manager, City of Azusa, 626-797-4757:

Our Public Works Superintendent identified AB 2766 funds to purchase alternative fueled vehicles. Back in 1998, we approved bids for five CNG trucks, (two are bi-fuel). However, it took months to get State approval for the vehicles, despite our efforts to comply with the stated policy of promoting cleaner air. We remained tenaciously committed to the goal and a little over a year later, finally received delivery.

It is essential to work with the end users of the vehicles. We organized the staffs from the affected departments into an Alternative Fuel Vehicle Policy Committee to actually hammer out the policy we took to the Council.

We were frustrated when we were fined $2,500 by AQMD because of a technicality when we were closing out our old gas tanks. The irony for us is that the year before we had won their prestigious “Clean Air” Award for our work in promoting transit use and ridesharing. So we persuaded them as an alternative to paying the fine to allow us to spend $20,000 for a slow fuel CNG facility for overnight vehicle fueling. (It costs $200,000 for a fast fuel station.) However, the Gas Company is considering putting in a fast fuel facility and we are actively assisting in lining up other jurisdictions to support this.

We are not a wealthy city. But even if you have limited finances, you can still do it. We have to consider the future of our planet; it is time to put into practice the motto, think globally, act locally.

T. L. Garrett, Air Quality Division, Environmental Affairs Department, City of Los Angeles, 213-580-1025

Types of Alternative Fuels: There are a variety of alternative fuels in use, including CNG (compressed natural gas), LNG (liquefied natural gas), LPG (liquid petroleum gas or propane), battery electrics, hybrids, biofuels (such as those made from waste grease, usually blended with diesel), and clean diesel.

Fueling Facilities: A slow fuel CNG facility takes 4 hours to fill one vehicle, or 12 hours if there are 12 vehicles on one compressor. It costs $2 million for a fast fill CNG station. Los Angeles has 200 electrical quick charge locations, but electric vehicle availability is almost zero. We have the infrastructure but almost no vehicles.

Types of Vehicles: Types of vehicles include: trash trucks, street sweepers, pickup trucks, cars, vans, shuttles and buses. All the City DASH buses are propane powered. There are also SULEVs (super ultra low emission vehicles) that produce less than 5% of the pollution of a standard car. The Harbor Post Office will have the first all-electric postal fleet. There are LPG/electric hybrid shuttle buses and dual fuel refuse trucks with LNG/diesel. The biofuel costs $3/gallon, compared to $1/gallon for diesel. The clean diesel particulate traps using low sulfur fuel from Arco can clean up much of the soot.

Funding Sources: Funding can come from the Carl Moyer program, MSRC, heavy-duty diesel retrofit program, AB 2766 funding for clean fuels, State energy program grants, etc. We got $50,000 for our alternative fuel taxi program.

Next steps for L.A. include:

– Identify alternative fuel niche applications in the city

– Apply for external funding and maximize leverage of city funds

– Focus more on infrastructure development.

Q: How do the alternative fuel refuse trucks work?

AGarrett: We ordered some 2 years ago, but they not been delivered yet. We tried 2 CNG trash trucks and had a bad experience.

Q: Does L.A. have an alternative fuel policy?

AGarrett: The Department of General Services has an alternative fuel policy, but only some departments have them. We need a critical mass of orders to bring down the cost of vehicle purchasing and infrastructure installation.

Green Building and Design

Susan Munves, Resource Efficiency Coordinator, City of Santa Monica, 310-458-8229:

Good green buildings often cost little or no more to build than inefficient ones. Our goal is to develop guidelines to encourage businesses to build them. We hired a team of consultants based in Vancouver to develop the guidelines. We focused on commercial and multi-family buildings.

A green building:

– Uses less water and energy

– Uses less materials

– Lowers building operational costs

Strategies:

– Use less to do more

– Use a careful combination of design strategies

– Build to adapt well and last longer

– Avoid creating problems that have to be fixed after the fact

– Take advantage of site conditions

Criteria:

– Targets are based on computer simulations of prototypical buildings:

– Base case models comply with Title 24

– Target models incorporate established energy efficiency measures

– Cost-efficiency is defined as simple payback of less than 5 years with no more than 3% increase in construction costs

Targets:

– 25% energy reduction from 1998 Title 24 for hotels and motels and light industrial buildings

– 20% reduction for offices and residences

Construction management:

– Prepare a demolition and site protection plan to divert at least 60% of waste away from landfills

– Salvage reusable materials

– Use recycled content products

Recommended practices:

– Provide advice and information for designers and developers

– Encourage an integrated approach

– Encourage designers to push the envelope with new designs

Our guidelines will apply to all new construction and substantial remodels. Assisted housing projects and city projects will incorporate all cost-effective methods as models. The new Santa Monica public safety facility we hope will be the greenest police headquarters in the world. We will use gray water for toilet flushing. We have reduced the size of HVAC (heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems) and the expected energy use.

Community Energy Efficiency Program, a Santa Clarita Success Story

George Burmeister, Colorado Energy Group (consultant to Santa Clarita), 303-494-4711:

The Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) is a utility-sponsored voluntary program, started by California local governments and the homebuilding industry in 1999, which encourages incentives from local governments to homebuilders to build at least 30% beyond code requirements for efficiency. The results are big savings in utility bills for the homeowners.

Housing is a huge market, with a projected 40% increase over the next few years. The potential energy and environmental savings are big, funding and technical assistance are available, and the homebuilding industry is supportive.

The benefits to local governments include:

– Longer lasting housing stock

– Meeting local energy saving goals

– Improved relations between the city and building professionals

– Improved environment and air quality (help meet the air quality mitigation strategy, air quality savings are bankable for the future, etc.)

– Improved resource efficiency

– Public recognition of program (if desired by homebuilders and/or the city/county)

– Economic multiplier effects – dollars stay in the community

Consumer benefits include:

– Substantial energy savings, more disposable income for families

– Easier access to financing, you qualify for more home

– Resale marketing edge

– More comfortable home

– Outdoor air quality improvement

Builders are required to:

– Attain a CHEERS environmental efficiency design rating of 86 (30% above the code requirement of 80) (which meets Energy Star criteria)

– Use engineer-designed and stamped HVAC plans

– Meet CEC tight duct criteria

– Have installing contractors meet quality of work guidelines

– Have CHEERS inspection and diagnostics verify the 86 score

Benefits to builders: The Santa Clarita Pilot Program has formal City Council support that if builders go beyond code by 30% they get the following benefits:

– Faster plan check review (if the time is cut in half, it often saves them $1,800)

– Fee discount/subsidy (the City Council appropriated funds which serve as small subsidies to builders)

– Special recognition (City will promote “greener builders”)

– Advertising/promotional support (funded by local utility and City)

Unique CEEP attributes:

– Strong support from utilities, builders and local government

– Verification of energy savings

– All homes meet EnergyStar requirements

– Free technical assistance provided

– Flexibility for local governments

Summary of community benefits:

– Improved resource efficiency

– Improved environmental air quality

– Longer lasting housing stock

– More recognition (again, only if desired)

– Energy savings and associated economic multipliers

– Enhanced image for community.

Q: What are your incentives for commercial development in Santa Monica?

AMunves: We looked at all the choices for incentives, but because of the highly politicized aspects of development in Santa Monica, we couldn’t use them. We are currently taking a regulatory approach, but we need incentives. We are looking at the program from the US Building Council.

Q: Are you doing workshops for local building contractors?

ABurmeister: We had peer review and focus groups. We received a grant from the Gas Company to implement the program. Workshops were not included in the grant, however, we do offer complimentary workshops for building contractors through funds provided by the U.S. Department of Energy.

Q: How is the program financed?

ABurmeister: Builders pay $400-600 per home to participate. The utilities pay for consultants (mostly me) to help each city or county on request. It is a great deal for the city or county!

Q: How can you get the cities to work together to implement this?

ABurmeister: City staff are overworked. We work with one city or county at a time–we have not really considered a regional approach, or a multi-city/county effort yet. We have 13 jurisdictions in the Los Angeles area alone that are implementing the Community Energy Efficiency Program now. City and county building officials work together closely–so, in essence, they are informally working together on CEEP. There is also some competition between jurisdictions, which helps our program.

AMunves: In Santa Monica, this is a cooperative program involving both the Environment Division and the Building and Safety Department, a coordination process which we need to make easier.

Cities for Climate Protection Campaign

Pam O’Connor, Santa Monica City Council:

The International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) brings together policy and technical people to support improvements in our cities. It provides the opportunity for people to come together to do whatever the community needs. It creates a network for sharing information and makes it fun and interesting. Their conferences are very practical and useful.

Abby Young, USA Director, ICLEI, 510-540-8843:

ICLEI brings together all the local strategies we have talked about today that contribute to curbing global warming. ICLEI involves governments around the world that are solving environment problems at the local level. My job is to encourage many cities to work together on this issue. ICLEI is based in Toronto, with 8 offices around the world, including Chile, Japan, Australia, Germany, and the USA.

The Cities for Climate Protection (CCP) campaign began in 1993 to see how cities can achieve global warming reductions without too much difficulty. We have developed a precise yet simple methodology that can work for all sizes of local governments. The steps we suggest for local governments are:

1. Do a baseline emission analysis for the entire community and forecast how emissions are likely to grow in the future without any action.

2. Adopt an emissions reduction target. Most municipalities are choosing to reduce 20% below 1990 levels by some future year. (The US national goal is 7% below 1990 emissions, yet, as a nation, we are now 25% above 1990 levels.)

3. Adopt a plan to do what is needed to achieve the target.

4. Implement the plan.

5. Monitor and report on the results.

It doesn’t cost anything to participate, but it is a big commitment by the city. However, since local governments actually bear the brunt of the impacts of global warming, it is a prudent step. The benefits of participation include improved local air quality and cost savings over the long term.

For example, fleet managers can identify ways to “green” their fleets. Denver did an assessment of vehicle usage and operating costs. They developed a Green Fleets program, that is saving $150,000/year in reduced vehicle and fuel costs. The City of Santa Monica has a Parking Cashout Program that pays municipal employees to carpool, take transit or bike to work. Another technique is using LED bulbs to reduce energy use and maintenance costs for traffic lights. Group purchasing can reduce the initial costs.

The City of Berkeley requires all buildings in the city to meet an energy efficiency code upon change of title. So far, this has upgraded 50% of their buildings. Ann Arbor, Michigan created a city energy facility fund, a self-sustaining loan fund that finances municipal energy-saving projects without negative impacts on the city budget. The city uses 80% of the savings to pay back the loan and keeps the other 20%. Then after the 5 year payback period, it keeps all the savings.

The total impact on global warming by the nearly 100 US cities involved in the CCP is a reduction of 7.5 million tons of greenhouse gases per year. If every city did these things, we would exceed the entire US reduction goal under the Kyoto protocol.

We would love to work with more local governments. We have software programs, materials and training workshops. Our next workshop in September in New Orleans will be on how to overcome barriers. We provide case studies and best practices guides with value pricing on local methods, for example, to reduce auto miles traveled. We also have references to expert consultants in the field of climate protection. We have leads on grant funding for solar power, transportation projects, outreach to local businesses, etc.

Dean Kubani, City of Santa Monica, 310-458-2227:

We have been very impressed with the ICLEI information. We get regular emails telling us about grant opportunities and networking with other cities doing this program. The ICLEI workshops are the best conferences because they provide the tools to get your job done. We recommend participation.

Field Visits to Santa Monica’s Facilities

(All speakers are on the staff of the City of Santa Monica)

Pico Boulevard Streetscape Project

Craig Perkins, Director, Environmental and Public Works Department, 310-458-8221:

We are enhancing the safety and appearance of Pico Boulevard by a median strip with trees, accent street lights, additional street streets and crosswalk enhancements. Many of the crosswalks will have in-street flashing lights that are activated by pressing the “walk” button.

Alternative Fuel Vehicles

Joe Delaney, Solid Waste Operations Manager, 310-458-8554:

We have 70% of the City’s Solid Waste vehicles on alternative fuels, including cars, trash trucks, street sweepers, shovel loaders, etc. We have both fast and slow fill CNG facilities. With the 5-7,000 psi compressor, we can fill an auto in the same time it takes to fill a gasoline powered vehicle. The capacity of the tank is equivalent to 25 gallons, so we can go all day without refilling. We do overnight slow fill at up to 3,800 psi to get more fill on the trash trucks. We often do a partial booster fill when the trucks are parked during lunch hour.

The problem is that Cummings has stopped production of the pure CNG engine for trucks. They do produce a dual CNG/diesel engine, but it has no spark plug, so it always needs a diesel mixture to ignite.

We also have on display the GEM neighborhood vehicles, which are street legal, can go up to 25 mph with a 40 mile range on electric batteries. They cost $10,000, but Arizona has a $10,000 tax credit, so they are essentially free there.

Green Fleets

Ralph Merced, Fleet Maintenance Supervisor, Department of Environmental and Public Works Management:

We use only re-refined oil and have had no problems. All warranties have been valid. (Santa Monica purchases it from the Rosemead Oil Company, 562-941-3261.) We have built a home-made rack to drain bottles to remove all the remaining liquid from bottles of oil and anti-freeze. We use propylene glycol because it is less toxic than regular antifreeze (Santa Monica purchases it from Cummings). Re-refined hydraulic fluid works well. Santa Monica doesn’t crush oil filters so they can be recycled more easily. (Santa Monica uses Delta Four in Sun Valley (818-767-2302) to recycle them for a small fee.) Water-based parts cleaner is used when doing brake work, etc. (Santa Monica purchases it from Colleen Hassell at Dura Chem, 714-630-4100). We purchase re-conditioned batteries from Advance Batteries in Santa Monica, 310-450-1630.

Retread tires work well on the heavy duty vehicles, but are not cost effective for passenger vehicles. For our bucket loader, we use a rubber blade made of 100% recycled tires (the rubber blade reduces wear on the transfer station concrete floors).

Green Street Repair

Bogee Cline, Street Maintenance Superintendent

We have a variety of methods for environmentally friendly street and sidewalk repair. One method is called “white topping,” which is a special mixture of cement with asbestos that goes over the old asphalt base. Because it is light colored it is 15º cooler in the summer sun, thus reducing the air conditioning bills for the people living on the street. The lower temperatures also reduce gasoline tank emissions from cars parked on the street. The light color also enhances the effect of street lights and makes people feel safer at night. The cost is about $15 per square foot, compared to $3.50 for asphalt, but it is supposed to last up to 50 years, versus 6 years for asphalt. We have tested it on a residential street and it seems to be working fine.

We are using brick pavers for sidewalks that are saving a lot of labor. When a tree root lifts up a paver, we just pull it up, cut out the root and put in back in a few minutes. They cost about $14 per square foot, compared to $8 per square foot for concrete. However, the brick pavers take much less time. We can repair 5 – 7 brick paved areas in a single day, as opposed to 4 – 5 concrete pours in a week.

We are testing rubberized sidewalks that are great for kids to play on because they are soft to fall on. They cost about $16 per square foot. Both the rubberized and the brick pavers have cracks between the blocks that allow the water to go through into the soil beneath which reduces urban runoff.

We are also refilling utility trenches with glass beads from recycled glass.

Green Cleaning Products and Equipment on the Third Street Promenade

Craig Perkins and Eddie Greenberg, Promenade Crew Leader, Solid Waste Management Department:

We use small electric utility trucks for maintenance. They can carry up to a ton of supplies. They only take an hour and a half to charge.

We use less toxic cleaning products to protect our employees’ health. In 1993 Santa Monica adopted a Toxics Use Reduction Program which governs the purchasing of all products that contain chemicals. This program, which was uated in 1998 by the US EPA, includes custodial supplies, fleet maintenance, pest control, street maintenance, and plumbing/paint shop operations. We have identified “green” alternatives in 15 of 17 cleaning product categories.

We buy 55 gallon drums and mix it into squirt bottles which are carefully labeled. The result has been improved custodial morale, as well as lower costs, with no reduction in effective cleaning.

Santa Monica Urban Runoff Recycling Facility (SMURRF)

Craig Perkins and Neal Shapiro, Urban Runoff Coordinator:

The SMURRF is designed to treat up to 0.5 million gallons per day of urban runoff, which is the dry water flow from the two main storm drains that serve Santa Monica — the Pico-Kenter and Pier drains. Before this facility, these drains sent untreated water directly into the Santa Monica Bay.

U.S. Nonprofit Organizations Working For Sustainability

Click on an organization to display a brief description and its hyperlink, if available.

American Forests

American Oceans Campaign

Center for Environmental Education

Citizens Network for Sustainable Development

Earth Island Institute

EDF — Environmental Defense Fund WorldWide

Friends of the Earth — US

Greenpeace International

The Institute for Local Self-Reliance (ILSR)

League of Women Voters

National Audubon Society

National Wildlife Federation

NRDC- Natural Resources Defense Council

Pesticide Action Network North America

Renew America

Sierra Club

The Trust for Public Land

Union of Concerned Scientists

World Resources Institute

World Wildlife Fund

Worldwatch Institute